benjii

I feel sorry for the Queen having to endure this turgid procession of banality. **** me, it's been boring!

Exactly. Penalty shoot outs are entirely fair and very entertaining. Great way to settle something.

I have come to the conclusion that the Olympics is much more enjoyable when staged somewhere else.

Adkins on Radio5 now.. "Lots of work going on behind the scenes. Going to add to the group of players. Great infrastructure..." Could be some moves imminent then. Doesn't sound like he's going to Liverpool anyway!

I doubt it. He looked very small physically when he played against Milwall this season. I expect it will be a couple of years before he is at Fox or Harding's level. There aren't many 17 year old defenders in the Premier League. People like Bale, Richards, Smalling etc are, in the nicest possible way, physical freaks. I don't think Shaw is. He may well be class but he will need to be introduced very carefully.

Stephen Hawking.****ing filthy.

I haven't read the first page but I bet Dubai Phil has posted something unpredictable and hilarious.

Just a guess but probably because he only goes to about 5 home games and it was easy to get tickets in the last seven years. I'm guessing he thinks it will be more hassle to get tickets next season. By the way, you're becoming proper ****ing monotonous on here. Boring.

Guly?! You stupid ******. You shouldn't be allowed in the ground.

Belmadi?! You flipping nutter. By the way, Gasmi.

Simply intolerable.

I've been to his house for dinner too. He played the xylophone. Lovely stuff.

Le Tiss v Blackburn is one of the beat goals EVER. By anyone. EVER.

I love Markus. I love Nicky. Who's the dude in the picture?

I swear I saw Morgan on the telly in the crowd at the Cardiff v WH match last night.

Looked like a boy amongst men against Milwall. I expect he's miles off the first team.

Thanks. So it's pretty simple stuff to use? You lost me at "media server"!

Agreed.

Now then, I understand it may be illegal to copy purchased dvds and so, personally, I would never do it. But, out of interest, if someone wanted to get a purchased DVD on to their iPad and they also had a pc would there be a simple and novice-friendly way of doing it and, if so, what is it? Just wondering if it's technically possible, that's all...

I know for a fact he's being replaced by Paul Hart.

I keep seeing this retarded statement, or variations of it.

You didn't go to their matches against us then?

Indeed. All this will do is make the Premiership even more of a closed shop and distort even more the value of parachute payments.

It strikes me that the main substantive concern here seems to be not the principle of inheritance but, in fact, the question of whether one should be permitted to own land at a particularly large scale. Is that, in fact, the main point of the thread? In other words, provided no one amasses too much land in the first place, there ought to be no issue with them passing that land on to whomsoever they choose (presumably with the proviso that the inheritee does not already own such amount of land that would take them over the prescribed limit)? Is that right? Or is really the principle itself of inheritance? Do away with that and you basically advocate arbitrary state appropriation of property (it takes enough ****ing money from people already FFS). So, what is this arbitrary limit to be? And all that needs to be done to get around it is to devolve legal ownership and use trustees etc... The corollary of what Pap really seems to be comtenplating is some sort of fundamental overhaul of the entire principle of legal ownership. Basically, it is uber-Marxist fluff, entirely incompatible with humanity and doomed to distortion, abuse and failure in all but the most simple of low-scale communities but entirely symptomatic of the sort of sixth-form totemistic moralising that would occur on, for example, a football forum. Pap, you should read some Rousseau (maybe you have). Great stuff, but pie-in-the-sky.