benjii

We are breaking them down. What do you mean by "break down"? You mean "score"? That's not what it means.

What does my nut in are the ridiculous conclusions people reach. By all means be frustrated that we aren't winning yet despite dominating. If you want to get hot under the collar and jittery that's fine by me. It's the comments like, "the gameplan is ineffective", that are just retarded.

Exactly. The lack of mettle some posters on here show is shocking. It's just so infantile.

0-0 does not equal "underperforming". Do you not think things are a bit more complicated than that? Who is underperforming then? Is it the defence? Is it the midfield? Is it Guly? Is it Lambert? What are we doing wrong?

Seek help. Seriously, I'm not joking. You're thinking, "He's trying to be funny". I'm not. Seek help.

60% possession and 8 attempts to 1. Very rare for any away team to be that dominant. It is evidently a good performance so far, lacking only a goal. How the **** can you disagree with that?

Get in! Nice one Hull.

Good performance so far. If we can get a goal soon this could be a very comfortable afternoon.

He does a retard's dance infront of the Northam when he reads the teams out pre-match.

4-4-2 I expect.

Ridiculously strong bench, as usual.

Sign of a bad attitude IMO. Either that or a phantom injury that actually means there is "activity" behind the scenes.

It's a pointless question. Only a footballing idiot would think he isn't good enough to contribute to the squad over the second half of the season so the only non-idiotic answer, in footballing terms, is "yes". However, if there is a problem in his head/attitude with him not being a guaranteed first XI player (or indeed any other off-field problem) then we may be better off cashing in and getting someone else. So the real question is, "Does Jason Puncheon want to come back?".

We're stupidly strong at left back with Mills as third choice. Ben Reeves also looks like he might be a really good player.

Not surprising to see Jaidi, Dickson and Hammond come in but I expected Dickson to be for Chambo rather than Harding. I think it's hard to chose between Butterfield and Richardson so it makes some sense to rotate them now and again. Changing 3 of the back 4 doesn't seem ideal but then those coming in should be good enough to get the result.

Knightmare http://www.knightmare.com/home/introduction.html Actually, not sure if I want to see it back but I would like to mention it as it was great.

Charlton and Huddersfield are no stronger than they were before - Charlton are probably weaker. Wednesday are the equivalent of Norwich or Leeds - ie a big club in a league they are too good for - but not as good. Brighton are probably a bit of a fad. No one is averaging two points per match. This is because they have not been good enough. We are second despite having had a ****e start and underperformed in many games. You're confusing competition with quality. I don't recall anyone saying the league was less competitive. Just less good. Which it probably is.

Presumably he was recovering from an illness which explains his absence from the previous game. I don't see what people's problem is. He's obviously a geeky nerdoid spaccazoid but FFS all English grounds have one. Would it be better if we did it Turkish style? Yes, probably.

Yeah, because it is a weaker league. The same reason that the top of the Prem is relatively open; because the top teams are much worse than they were before. Come the end of the season the total required for second place and play-offs will almost certainly be lower than last season; ergo, from the point of view of anyone with designs on promotion it is weaker IMO.

Well, if you look at the points tallies of the top teams it looks like it is.

Fingers crossed. The weakining of other teams in League One in January could be great news for us.

He didn't go on a free he was part of the Wilson deal.

Mental! Absolutely mental!

I've corrected it.

He is a decent Championship level striker so he certainly would be. Can't see him coming back though.