Dark Munster

That lad had a far superior squad. And finished fourth in a three horse race.

Which begs the question, why the hell did SR choose him in the first place? Most Swansea fans were happy to see him go. If they do sack him I have zero confidence that they won’t make the same mistake again.

I like the cut of your jib even though you are stark raving mad!

His investment is £0. It's Dragan's money he's flushing down the toilet.

If you mean because he's not good enough, I disagree. If you mean because RM won't give him a chance I think you're right.

Rasmus Ankersen certainly would.

I can guarantee a nuclear meltdown if we lose 3-0.

Me too, I've also been saying this for a long time now. He clearly has, and seemingly continues, to be fooled by Ankersen's bullshit. I know he doesn't know much about football, but as a successful businessman it surprises (and frustrates) me that he hasn't seen through it by now.

In other words, it's a must win match? Hard to argue with the tractor boy about that.

Sacked after 3 draws and one loss. De Boer had 4 losses after his famous sacking by Palace. It took 7 defeats out of 8 for Rasmus and SR to finally pull the trigger on mad Nate, even though everyone else and their dog knew well before that that he was out of his depth. If we keep on losing I fear it’ll take even longer for them to admit their mistake this time. 😕

It doesn’t have to be launching long balls to a tall CF a la mad Nate. We have players who can get crosses in and play some great through balls for such a player who can also hold the ball up. But that seems against RM’s religion, which is why he won’t give TP a sniff. Just like pointless suicidal pissing around the back is his religion.

Here's hoping.

The point is it’s proof that the squad isn’t as bad as some say. Regarding RM, yes at times he does get it right. The playoffs for example. But getting your players to do well for a third of the match clearly isn’t enough. He keeps making the same tactical mistakes and has a terrible defensive record with every club he’s managed.

No one is saying our squad is as good as their billion pound squad. But the fact we were able to match them for the first third of the match means our squad isn’t crap. With a decent manager we have the players that can compete with others in the bottom half. Look at Ipswich what a difference a good manager makes.

Ok old school wasn’t the best term. What I meant is they aren’t interested in an old experienced PL manager. At least they haven’t before. Maybe they’ve learnt their lesson.

If we lose the next two league matches against Ipswich and Bournemouth I would say his position would be untenable.

Not a cat's chance in hell that Ankersen and SR will hire anyone who is "old school". They are only going to hire someone sufficiently hipster and unproven at this level, which would show they are cleverest geniuses on the planet.

Bugger. That means he only misses two PL matches.

You mean like they did a few years ago with de Boer after 4 matches? They ended up finishing 11th.

Yes, but Dragan should. It's his money they are flushing down the toilet with their incompetence.

If the players aren’t good enough how come we more than matched Utd for the first 30 minutes? I’m not saying we have a great squad, but we do have one that can give it a good go at finishing above 18th. With a competent manager.

Back to back automatic promotions. It was a difficult start but definitely better performances as we got used to the level of the PL. In fairness NC wouldn’t sack RM if he was in charge now. Because he wouldn’t have hired him in the first place. Ankersen and SR are costing Dragan a fortune. If I were him I’d take action now.