Jump to content

John B

Members
  • Posts

    9,876
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by John B

  1. Yes good post 3 and 4 probably caused 5 to 10 to happen
  2. Of course it may have but having to reduce costs surely is going to make the team worse
  3. Yes that could be true but having a crap team does not help If we had done better last season we may have had more season ticket holders
  4. No money means a crap team and crap attendances this season Money means a crap team last season with attendances boosted by season ticket holders expecting us to be promoted
  5. Why were Euell and John signed We already had BWP SAGA Rasiak but we had not many decent defenders. I know John scored lots of goals but maybe Rasiak and Saga would have if they played
  6. Yes you are right Sid but Rasiak was a Burley Lowe signing I believe
  7. So going into Administration is nothing to with the financial state the club is in because income is less than expenditure together with the massive loss incurred last year because of the facts articulated by SIDTHESQUID
  8. No because Lowe was not involved when the players were signed on massive wages we could not afford neither was Wilde when Euell and John were signed. These are the facts surely.
  9. Hone did recognise there was a problem but he is quite happy probably living on the money he earnt at SFC Crouch was still living in Wilde's fantasy world that investment was round the corner highly unlikely as you say because of the credit crunch. Lowe failed to keep us in the Premiership and failed to keep us out of Administration but was not completely to blame for getting the club into the situation it is today
  10. Yes but whoever was in charge this season would probably have led us to administration. I bet Crouch is really happy he is just like us a fan. It is the same with the UK economy the Tories and Liberals are laughing because they not in charge
  11. I know you dont like Lowe but surely most of the blame should be heaped on Wilde That is my point. But when Lowe goes are you going to be a happy little Alpine or have you another hate figure lined up?
  12. Lots of teams get relegated from the Premiership in fact three every season We are in the mess now because we spent too much on players fees and wages
  13. Lee Harvey Oswald had one contact the Dallas Police
  14. Well he did spend £8 million on players but in general I agree with your sentiments thats why I think he is a lot more culpable than Lowe. I also blame Crouch a little for believing Wilde's fantasies and backing him. I know fans wanted Lowe out but getting in Wilde has turned into a disaster
  15. Yes but at the time the Sky money was not as big as it is today But as you rightly know say it is only ifs and whats. The investment Wilde put in has really caused the problem because it did not bring success and we have to pay the wages of the players
  16. I know everybody says that but buying in players does not guarantee success. Where was the money to come from? We were investing in the Academy and if Bale Walcott Jones had not been sold we would have been in administration earlier WE have been trying to get investment for years Losing Strachan was the key because we were rudderless
  17. Yes again that was Wilde thinking something could be achieved when we were already stuffed. We needed to off load our high earners by selling them and not loaning them to reduce the overdraft
  18. Yes I totally agree but as most people hate Lowe he gets all the blame when I think lots should be heaped on Wilde and his fantasies. Even now fans think Investment fist spouted by Wilde will solve everything which of course it would in theory. But in practise it is very difficult to get in large investors because of the circumstances at SFC
  19. Obviously he was responsible for taking us down but not for causing the mess we are in today. But surely Wilde is the main culprit
  20. It is not Lowe who destroyed the club he tried to save it It was Michael Wilde and those players bought in on huge wages
  21. We failed because we could not raise any money from selling players bought in by the previous regimes and because of the high wages paid to them.
  22. http://www.skysports.com/football/
  23. No I agree with you I think we may have sold if we were in deep trouble especially Dyer. However I am not certain that there were potential buyers for any of the others thats all
  24. Maybe no one wanted to buy If you were a championship club who would you buy?
  25. Yes Ok but why would anybody leak them?
×
×
  • Create New...