-
Posts
9,831 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by John B
-
Yes I agree Lowe may have earnt loads of dosh but syphoned off is a little strong
-
Yes but most successful business changes are not discussed in the Press
-
The strategy is to keep us out of Administration I would have thought nothing to do with how well we play this season. I thought if we survive this year then obviously more focus will put onto developing the team It may have worked if we had sold some of Rasiak John Euell Thomas Skacel Saga Lallana or Surman but no club seems to want them and our overdraft is still high. I still cannot see how as a club we can progress if we do not get a huge investment without developing some good young players who do not demand wages of £10000 per week which we will be unable to afford
-
Perhaps he is counting his money
-
Rod is supporting somebody for Chairman of the English Cricket board who apparently a mate of Lowe's Lord Marland
-
I would have thought isf SCW was getting what you said he was getting he was better value than Euell I am not saying what he is worth only he is a sharp cookie. But Kim is only an agent of sorts By the way how much is Harry worth?
-
I know sometimes the facts do not meet with your opinions. Even with Pearson there would be the need for agents maybe Lawrie's son
-
Well if Kim talk as much sense as SCW then I think it is a good idea employing him. A very sharp cookie is SCW he takes no crap from anyone
-
Possibly true but Crouch maybe be saying he will put in £2million knowing Wilde/Lowe wont or cant match it.
-
We need any investment to be used so that we dont go into administration . But the whole idea is beginning to look ridiculous I agree with Weston I just have the feeling it was Crouch who told this story to the Echo to make himself look good.
-
Please explain
-
All in the detail I would have thought Crouch is not going to give £6m without a watertight deal probably will get Lowe/Wilde shares as Proxies. The most important thing if this is to go forward is getting £4million
-
Even with Crouch's Money if that occurs we are not going to be that successful in CC and the fans wont like that. That is the reason I liked the idea of getting in really good young players and developing them but that takes time The average fan does not appear to want to wait success today is the most important criteria for them but is not always possible.
-
I dont really think it is going to happen as Mary Corbett was apparently very confrontational yesterday. Probably another of Crouch's PR Offensives Pity really because it is the best approach I have seen recently to get rid of Wilde/Lowe but of course it would leave us nowhere near a position to return to the Premiership
-
It is suggested that he buys their shares I thought But for this deal to happen there must be compromises on all sides otherwise SFc will probably go into Administration .
-
Yes it would have to be an agreement not only reducing the debt but also that Wilde and Lowe sell their shares in the future . Perhaps the bank would take £4mill and the rest could be used on players. Crouch is going to be rather busy trying to find the extra £4 mill I dont know that this deal will happen but it is a start. If we did go into Administration it looks as though Crouch is the only one likely to buy the club
-
The agreement would include something about selling Lowe/Wilde selling their shares in the future and not returning. Otherwise you are right it would be a stupid approach
-
Yes you are right but can you think of a better approach. It is a shame Crouch did not come up with the idea when he was in charge but I think he was expecting an takeover from Fulthorpe.
-
No the 6 million goes to the club nothing goes to Wilde and Lowe they still have their shares they of course could return but the deal will probably include their non return. I think it is a good approach but then I dont have £6 mill
-
Although I understand your sentiments surely the best way forward is to reduce the debt as described and Lowe and Wilde will no longer run the club although they will have shares. If they did go through boycotting as you suggest the debt would still be there are likely to be larger and some of it would have to be paid off before buying players
-
The structure of the payments into the club would not havebeen gifts, rather interest free loans repayable on the club’s return to the Premiership. That is going to take some time so it probably is a gift
-
Perhaps he cant speak Polish or Czech
-
http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4077382.Saints_explain_van_der_Waals__role/ At long last an explanation He appears to be an agent not employed by the club but would no doubt earn fees
-
If this manager is so good why has he not got a job
-
JP apparently had more experience of leading teams of youngsters when the club had no money I thought was the reason given. But I still dont know whether he resigned or was sacked. I agree with Ottery if he was sacked I would have thought Wotte would have been sacked as well. It does not add up