I dont think it is a fact just your analysis not based on facts.
It was obvious we had to sell players but probably no one wanted to buy them at reasonable prices
Getting in good loan strikers at low wages I would have thought was very difficult
Yes I agree with you but the PFA often pay players wages in these situations
Still not good but I would have thought anybody making a realistic bid would
be giving the Administrator Options on
1 Which League SFC would be playing in next season
2 How many points if any the club would de deducted next season.
Not owning the ground will not stop somebody buying us .
But not having Premiership Status may.
In fact over the last few years on SISU appears to want to buy us
I had two problems with Burley
1 He brought in average players at overated wages
2 He was always looking to get in midfield and forward players when I thought the defence needed attention.
But the team played reasonably well until late 2007
I know I what you are saying but it could be said that if Lowe never went we would not have had to pay out £1,000,000 and had lots of youngsters playing.
I was only be simplistic not realistic
If Lowe had not gone the first time we would not be in Administration as we would have saved a £1000000
Is that right?
So getting rid of Lowe got us into Administration it appears
Thanks working now in summary
Lowe should have invested more with money from somewhere in 2003-2004
Wilde had ideas which could never be met.
Crouch believed that investment was around the corner
Hone etc earned a fair amount during there involvement which has led us to administration.
Lets hope the next lot will be more realistic and we become successful again