John B

Should it not be Sir Alf surely we have had no other knights play for us

Unfortunately I think you maybe wrong there He is employed to develop the players so that in the future we may prosper something which he is apparently doing quite well If we had a goal scorer things maybe different I realise we have loaned out Rasiak Saga John but this was done for financial John did not score today neither did Rasiak which was not surprising as he was not playing

Ridiculous Post why should JP resign?

Yes

Ivan Golac Mick Mills Stuart Williams Peter Rodriques

You must be joking In the forty five years supporting Saints this pair were nowhere near the top 5 Claus was a lightweight Richards Overated

What were happen to our loans if we were not a PLC?

The successful teams of the 1980s were built on home produced talent plus exceptional good players brought in. Hopefully this will happen in the future

I think Smith was loaned because of Holmes' injury. Perhaps if Best Blackstock Cranie Mills had not gone we would not needed Cork Pekhart Robertson and Pearce. But of course some of the loanees may be better

And Me too The 1976 Man U team was quite strong I was there but could not remember any off them

I thought we had some company looking for investors or has that contract been cancelled

I thought Pekhart was going to be a good loanee.

Are you not a little more confident than a month ago?

Some of your points are correct better supported and more united. But Crouch does not appear to know how to run the Football Club he is a supporter and supporters are not very good at running clubs apparently

I think the team is performing better and the general feeling of the fans is slightly more confident. What is your definition of doing it on the cheap

I would thought it a good date lots of people off work can attend

I think he had to explain to the shareholders why the accounts were in such a bad shape with large losses although some of the language could have been tempered. I think it should have not been mentioned it is an official document. It was not aimed at Crouch personally as although he was there the whole year he was not Chairman the whole time If he had come out in a Newspaper Article I would have agreed

I am with you but I would add Wilde to your list. By the way who are the despicable cronies?

I am not a shareholder either but at the moment the club is not in administration but I take your point. Long term I would rather we succeeded with the current approach than be beholden to some rich guy or guys like West Ham Newcastle Portsmouth or Liverpool

I have read the articles and find their content rather simplistic and unreal

Maybe but I would have thought it is niave to think all shareholders would give their shares away for nothing as currently they do have a value .

But where is right person? That is my only problem with Crouch he seems to think somebody is going to invest and everything is going to be Ok which makes him sound a bit niave and does not give me confidence in his ability. Plainly investment has not arrived despite many false dawns and if it does there is going to be hard work in order to fashion a team which will perform well and to continue to do so in the future. We tried to buy a team to gain promotion but that failed spectactularly so buying players may not be the complete solution

I agree Wilde Lowe and Crouch are all to blame for our current demise in that order. However whether Crouch could have stopped the rot is open to question whether Wilde and Lowe can is also open to question but there are slight signs of recovery but only time will tell Why they cannot stop bickering is the main question of course as Crouch says Investment is probably the only way forward but as nothing has happened in three years something else has been tried. They should all keep quiet and as the previous poster says get behind the team.

We could win Burnley have just beaten Arsenal in the Carling Cup