Forget about the fact Saga could throw us a relegation lifeline, it also makes financial sense to be playing him to bump up what we can get for him when he's sold in the summer. I'm sure this is a big factor is Lowes decision to pick him for the team.
Correct. Football is like smoking cigarettes. Both are highly addictive and habbit forming, but a period of abstainence can break the habbit. Over time crowds will pick up, but it won't happen overnight once Lowe has gone.
In answer to the original question i think we simply cannot afford not to play Saganowski. That said it's probably a case of shuting the stable door with the horse already bolted.
"they are easy with their judgement"
were Wottes words to describe Saints fans, therefore i will reserve giving him any credit until i see us out of the relegation zone.
Todays was a must win - we won, Cardiff is a must win. I think Cardiff will be a tough proposition and i'd expext them to beat us, but let's hope i'm wrong.
I got to questions 10 and 11 and had to give up because you can't answer these questions on a scale of 1-10:
10) How boring is it for you to attend the match?
11) To what extent do you enjoy being at a match?
Both answers differ from game to game and from season to season. If we're playing well and win you enjoy it more than losing etc.
Yep, i agree with you. It's a breath of fresh air and just what was needed. I think this is what has rattled Ruperts little helpers the most - there's no mud they can sling at him so they've had to resort to petty digs.
Wottes comments fall into that category and i wouldn't rule out him taking instructions on what to say by the dark lord himself.