Window Cleaner

Salz is a legal man, he isn't a financier or a city broker. He's said to have a fine legal brain but as we all know the law has limits, it's mainly about argueing your case with reference to statutes and former cases, it's not an inventive or reckless profession where big balls win the day.

I honestly doubt that Mr Salz has sufficient funds to be a significant part of a consortium to buy out the club. 15/20 million is the going rate, that's a lot of money.

Is that not for violent sins? we are guilty of indulgence, thus circles 1-5 for us. Not a new tack really, I think Atletico Madrid's fans had 'a year in purgatory' T-shirts made up when they got relegated.

Thing is Lowe wouldn't be the top man. Tom Scott is a reasonable guy (from what I hear from the few Guernsey insiders that I know) and would probably do the club proud. If Lowe's role is only minor I don't think there's much to fear. Plus I think Mike Richards would be a good bloke for chairman.

36 tomorrow in fact, trouble is the forwards in the League 1 are going to get younger and faster and positioning and experience doesn't always counter that.

Indeed, Elizabeth Bishop would have it the it is an art-losing that is. Lose something every day. Accept the fluster of lost door keys, the hour badly spent. The art of losing isn't hard to master. Then practice losing farther, losing faster: places, and names, and where it was you meant to travel. None of these will bring disaster. _ Quite apt I think, we have become so used to losing and ignomy that we can accept relegation to the third tier and a points deduction with little difficulty.

Women out... of football.

But then we had one of those, his side are currently leading Man U 2-0 at Old Trafford, but we imposed Sir Clive FkinWoodward on him and ****ed him off. .

Is that better than the 3rd division south though? Have I gone full circle yet.

And we seem to have our fair share of them.

Need better strikers than that I'm afraid. No more Wotton either thanks, Perry may be too old for League 1 next year. We need 3 or 4 players minimum.

Didn't, they got -10 and then -17 I think,jiggery pokery, multiple administrations, failing to agree terms with creditors and all that stuff. Probably was -15 but the FL probable gave them a couple extra for LLS.

Not so much , it could be that the last play-off place in that league requires a staggering 80 points this year, imagine that we'd need 90 or more. P46 W25 D15 L6 sort of scale.

Might as well save the money, it won't work anyway. Result today? very much as expected, in fact it was quite decent, Burnley are* a good side, perhaps not today because they just needed a point .

Allied to the 2 we missed against Watford.

What again, how many is that we've missed this season, more than we've scored I bet.

It doesn't change much except that it's just us, norwich and forest now as things stand.

with a Barnsley-Plymouth kick about on the last day where a draw suits everybody concerned..

Stopped when we went into admin and lost to Charlton in a 3 day spell. Just waiting for next season now.

It's not about the mathematical calculations, I don't think 50 points will be enough to stay up.

makes little difference, 50 points won't be enough anyway and we can't get any more than that. Still beating Burnley would be a good result anyway.

Wheel him in, he's about as straight up and down as all the owners/chairmen of the top Prem clubs. Football is not the Women's Institute, it's a business where wheeling and dealing and dodgy doing are the rule rather than the exception. If the blokes got the money it takes he's OK by me.If you want a Mother Theresa try somewhere down in Blue Square. Give me a Ghengis Khan type any day.

Miraculous recovery from the same sort of injury as the one Thomas hasn't fully recovered from apparently. Dodgy doos methinks. Either you're out for the season or you ain't if he wasn't why say he was, hope we don't cause him permanent damage by playing him too soon, like we did with Pahars to name but one of many. We're down anyway, the Forest result means we'll be on -10 next season anyway so why risk Gillett when we could put Molyneux in for all it matters.

As I said yesterday 50 points is by no means a guarantee of finishing higher than the bottom 3.

Great no Skacel, what's that about then?