shurlock

And in some possible branches of the future, Cummings is a whiter-than-white truthseeker rather than a sociopathic slaphead.

Basically £5m difference between 8th and 15th. The difference is negligible.

Basically £5m difference between 8th and 15th. The difference is negligible.

I'll raise you an assassination plot pal. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/03/europe/macron-assassination-plot-foiled/index.html

Perfect sense?

I assume we'll be bringing in another attacker?

People knew the consequences... https://www.ft.com/content/0c3427b2-5ce1-11e7-9bc8-8055f264aa8b #projectfear

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G0D28KV9TI 24m0s - with arguments like that, remain never stood a chance #feelingsoverfacts

He needed 8 chances to score against Burnley IIRC -and managed to bundle in is goal from open play only after the second attempt (from a couple of yards). Missed some sitters against Swansea. I could go on. A distinctly average player and injury prone.

Very good, pal.

Can I click on a link to an article that makes him sound like the Polish Franco Baresi?

Bompey 2 (Ake, Defoe) Saints 1 (Bednarek) or Bompey 3 (Ake, Defoe, Bednarek OG) Saints 0?

Nothing against the lad, though can't help but think it's another incremental dilution of the quality in the squad.

Cheers you two

https://www.ft.com/content/e1dc9558-5db2-11e7-b553-e2df1b0c3220 Another point of difference with Corbyn's Labour which still wants the UK to participate in many of the EU's regulatory agencies and would countenance the ECJ playing a role in some areas.

Seems you don't have a scooby either.

Just you, pal.

The mimic reference was to Benji, not you

The Labour manifesto made it clear that freedom of movement will end on leaving the EU (p.28 ). Hard to see how that can be reconciled with retaining ALL the benefits of the single market given any Norway-type deal involves accepting FoM more or less unqualified. The idea that Labour is simply mimicing the mantra of the Tories i.e. leave but retain the benefits is plain nonsense, however. While it falls short of FoM, Labour has made it clear it favours a more open and flexible immigration system than the Tories and certainly than the jihadis. Among other things, it hasn't made cutting net migration a priority. The Mail even alleged Corbyn wanted 'unlimited immigration'. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/may/31/labour-policy-paper-leak-jeremy-corbyn-uncontrolled-migration-theresa-may-daily-mail In other words, this gives "talk of leave but retain the benefits" some practical bite. Flexibility on immigration gives it negotiating power over the degree to which it can secure those benefits. Of course, absence of FoM, it may be a pale imitation of full SM access. But it opens up opportunities that are precluded by the the red lines and dogmatisim of the hard brexiteers. Finally, just to clear things up for the kippers who claim otherwise: there is no mention in the Labour manifesto of leaving the customs union. Nada, zilch, rien.

Basically public information?

#toddlerwithamachete

The Leslie-ites will preach the gospel of resale value and make you a disciple of the Southampton Way yet, Glasgow. Don't underestimate their missionary zeal.

Just another day in Trumpworld: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/29/donald-trump-launches-astonishing-attack-us-television-presenter/