shurlock

It could easily be poch arriving for spurs v soton earlier in the season.

For all we know, it could easily be poch arriving for spurs v soton earlier in the season...

Will tonight's result have any bearing, however minor on whether Ancelotti leaves and would consider the spurs job?

If it couldn't get worse, you'll soon have Flyer to discuss this with....

A jos lazy leg

"Ships in the night...." is probably the most appropriate seafaring or naval metaphor here.

As I say, what you do hear is how Rooney hasn't reached his potential or best on the international stage, not that he might never reach it. Scholes saying he might be past is best is some statement IMO.

Don't hear it from ex pros, let alone a united legend. And what you do hear is how Rooney hasn't reached his potential or best on the international stage, not that he might never reach it. Big difference.

Got mine a month or so ago.

Love scholesy - someone with the balls to say it http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/may/22/paul-scholes-criticises-manchester-united-wayne-rooney?CMP=twt_gu

The guy is first and foremost a Saints fan, then a CEO who is meant to be professionally detached. Its a microcosm of the fan on the board problem.

Whether the story is true or not, you would have to be a gullible fool to believe anything the Metro says. Even its story-subsidising adverts are more believable.

Any stats also have to compare the defensive side of their games given MP's setup. Pretty sure the difference between Lallana and Ramirez becomes even clearer with those.

Would love to get Afellay in.

A bit tinpot.

I'd suggest there are many operational, marketing and management things responsible for that - after all, it didn't stop the first red kit flying off the shelves. Again there might have been lots of things responsible for that too. Right as I told myself never to post on a kits thread, the retarded younger brother of the PTS thread where the mongboards best and brightest come to fantasise about the width of stripes and do charming little mock ups, I'll bow out here.

As someone no longer with us used to say, you're doing an admirable impression of an Italian tank. So it might make a tmarginal impact - imposing little or no additional cost. Disgruntled pony fiddlers like yourself don't really count. I couldn't give two f**ks what colour we play in. Red and white stripes will do fine. But I'm more interested in your suggestion that there are droves on here who think it's the holy grail of competitive advantage. Do tell me who they are...please do. Or I'll take it you're wrong yet again.

Who knows it might have been a 11th, 12th or more if they had been playing in red.

Christ almighty small fry, even by your standards, this is a whopper. Scientists look for independent effects. The claim is not that teams in red win; rather it is that teams in red are more likely to win after controlling for everything else that might affect success i.e. a team's ability among other explanatory factors. That's what these experiments try to do -and with large samples. Simply trotting off teams of wildly differing abilities that have won a league and not worn not in red is Fry-like logic. My local Sunday league side wears red - it hasn't won the World Cup ergo the theory is wrong and you're right. Nice one. How do you manage to do your shoelaces.

Wreaks of insecurity too. Didn't realise it was physiologically possible for a 'dwarf wop' to induce a small penis complex.

Amusing article on Sinclair's spell at WBA http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/special-feature-scott-sinclair---7091579

LaGuardia is a s**thole.