Winchester Red

He does have an issue with NC (which in my view is justified for him on a personal level) but it goes much further back than that. Not about Tickets or any other policy issue (particularly not about tickets to ex-players!!!) He's a fan of SFC first and foremost - Managers, Chairman and Players all come and go. As for Sky, I think he tows the party line (they have their own agendas) and that's why he gets more than his fair share of the work. (That is just my opinion though - I know nothing about that from the horses mouth as it were)

Fox played 70 minutes of the game with an injury against Wigan and still NA didn't bring on Shaw. On that basis what was the point of putting him on the f*cking bench. We're not pimpey with a half empty bench to fill (Yes I know, they'd have left it empty rather than put a young player on it anyway). I'm not a fan of Fox but it was clear (to me anyway) that we were not the same team when he wasn't mobile enough to provide the width any more. Thought we were decent for the first 20 minutes until his injury and after that we were carp

I saw him personally. I don't believe it is a view that he has ever expressed on TV and doubt he would. He's a fan of Nigel. On the other point, I think our second choice front 3 isn't a patch on the first choice, so one of them should have still stayed on. Just my opinion though

If we are going to win games it's going to need to be 4-3 a lot of the time, but I think we might have the attacking players to pull that off

I'm with the 3-6-1 vote Maybe we can take a vote and lobby Adkins on it?

Should do - Punch was immense today If he could perform like that every week I'd say give the man a new contract. I suspect however that the moment it was signed we have the other version back again

If NA hadn't made those subs and we lost 3-2 everyone would be saying why the f*ck didn't he add some fresh legs, the players were knackered after 75 minutes. I agree with what Le Tiss said after the match, one of the front 3 needed to stay on just in case. As for the Redknapp story, saw Le Tiss a few weeks back and he predicted the NC would not give NA long and Redknapp would replace him so he isn't going to completely rubbish todays report (I think it would be a crazy thing to do though)

Is Mayuka available?

No Mayuka?

Get in

I thought it was because they won 4 of their first 3 matches giving 2 points (-10+12) That works with Skate arithmetic!

I doubt they'd worry about trivial facts like that. No different to setting aside £2m pounds for ex-players who've agreed settlements to the tune of £8m with TB

Redknapp? That'll be the guy that got us relegated from the PL last time then, yes?

So it's Mr Chainrai in the Snooze again now is it? It was every word from Satan to C*nt last week Wouldn't be trying to worm there way back in with him would they, just in case he's the man in control again Hope he tells them (and Allen particularly) to F*ck Off

I'd be amazed if BC hasn't applied to have the business wound up in the last week. It's worth more now that it has been for a long time with the £3m in the bank, and moe than it's likely to be ever again the way TB is throwing short term contracts around (and racking up further fees for himself) I think it probably just hasn't been made public

FT Means Colchester as well as Bournemouth will lose a point when the results are expunged

2-2 Sh1t

We don't need to close this thread... We just need to open a second thread for people to post ACTUAL NEWS on, and let the bed wetters use this one for wrist slashing on

The FL really must say that's your lot Any injuries and you play youth players, just like most of the other L1 and L2 teams. They also ought to be fined or deducted points for leaving gaps on the bench when they could be giving their youth players valuable experience. Why would any Dad put his kid in the PFC academy? You're guaranteed not to be valued in the slightest.

People are speculating using the previous transfers that went wrong as evidence and ignoring the ones that went right. We keep transfers quiet if we get the option. People have no idea how long the ones that went right took to complete

If you agree to a transfer with non-standard terms (ie, more money up front), particularly in europe with a blabby chairman and agents you'll only make you're life more difficult in the future. If you cave to this one then the next will ask the same thing, then the next, then the next If you don't get your man so be it Some on here need to grow up. All part of the must have it now generation I suppose

We'll get by with JF and JH, until one gets injured - then we're f*cked

More transparency on transfers would f*ck even more of them up Need to keep quiet until they're done This guy certainly has an axe to grind and he's picked a weird day to do it after yesterdays display PS - There's no evidence of the Davis transfer ever being nearly messed up. Maybe a bit more patience would have made it cheaper is all

Too bloody right

The Football League must know that's what they're up to though. Surely they're not that stupid? Every team names a kid or 2 on the bench anyway. It gives them match day experience and how can they ever break through if you don't It should be compulsory