Jump to content

MarkSFC

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    2,290
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MarkSFC

  1. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    Thanks. Appreciate it.
  2. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    Brilliant post. Clown poster.
  3. Yeah we do. On the reports I've seen they want near to 25m and we have offered 10m. Split the difference and add in Obefemi to the deal and it might cost us 10m ish now. That leaves us 18m from the Ings money (30 less 2m for Liberpool, less 10). Delaney is apparently available for 8/9m which seems good, probably less in reality given his age, so we'd probably have 10m plus what ever else is left for another striker?? Think this is a good deal for us overall.
  4. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    For 30m mate it's a decent outcome. Freshen things up now and not worry about having to replace him next season with no money!!
  5. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    It had better be 30m plus...won't be though
  6. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    SSN announce he has signed for fucking Villa...
  7. Improvement = coach doing his job Regression = coach not doing his job Poor form does not equal regression.
  8. Bednarek lost form, that's not regression. Regression is becoming worse and not returning to normal levels. That may be the case, and if so in 2 or 3 months time ypu can come back and say I told you so. Valery has clearly had off field issues, and is still in the development stage of his career so not really an example.
  9. Thats form, seriously affected by massive injury issues. Redmond I will agree with no doubt.
  10. I agree.
  11. Who specifically?
  12. Ok🤣🤣 https://bvbbuzz.com/2020/10/18/michael-zorc-thomas-delaney-outstanding-job-centre-back/ Sign him up!!!
  13. Not according to anything I've read and tranfrmarket.com who are normally spot on with these things. Happy to be shown otherwise?
  14. Delaney is a CM.
  15. If reports are to be believed we have chased Livramento since March so not a last minute switch. Perhaps we want both, perhaps we want Williams "at a certain price" which is likely to be less than Manure want.
  16. Some. But not one which is about actually doing what the game is all about; scoring goals!!!
  17. Like most I've not seen this kid other than the obligatory YouTube clips,but this feels exciting. Welldone Saints, positive. Just hope for 2 or 3 more...
  18. I expect so...
  19. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    Please explain your reasoning for saying we are a shambles. Not necessarily disagreeing just curious what aspects you reg a rd as a shambles.
  20. For me.. Sell Vestergaard Ings Redmond Forster Ellounoussi Long (free) Obefemi Valery (see below) Buy First choice CB First choice Striker First choice Winger type First choice GK Squad DCM Squad LB Squad RB (unless Valery has turned a corner) Who knows on the numbers (or the names more importantly) to do that but that's my list fwiw😆
  21. Maybe not....at least for a while I'd predict.
  22. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    You miss the point. He was simply talking about value, as in even if they paid 40-50m for Ings he'd think that was better value than 160m for Kane.
  23. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    Speaking to a City ST holder earlier and he'd rather they spend 40-50m on Ings than 160m on Kane!!
  24. Perhaps it still is.
×
×
  • Create New...