Jump to content

MarkSFC

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    2,228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MarkSFC

  1. Not according to anything I've read and tranfrmarket.com who are normally spot on with these things. Happy to be shown otherwise?
  2. Delaney is a CM.
  3. If reports are to be believed we have chased Livramento since March so not a last minute switch. Perhaps we want both, perhaps we want Williams "at a certain price" which is likely to be less than Manure want.
  4. Some. But not one which is about actually doing what the game is all about; scoring goals!!!
  5. Like most I've not seen this kid other than the obligatory YouTube clips,but this feels exciting. Welldone Saints, positive. Just hope for 2 or 3 more...
  6. I expect so...
  7. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    Please explain your reasoning for saying we are a shambles. Not necessarily disagreeing just curious what aspects you reg a rd as a shambles.
  8. For me.. Sell Vestergaard Ings Redmond Forster Ellounoussi Long (free) Obefemi Valery (see below) Buy First choice CB First choice Striker First choice Winger type First choice GK Squad DCM Squad LB Squad RB (unless Valery has turned a corner) Who knows on the numbers (or the names more importantly) to do that but that's my list fwiw😆
  9. Maybe not....at least for a while I'd predict.
  10. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    You miss the point. He was simply talking about value, as in even if they paid 40-50m for Ings he'd think that was better value than 160m for Kane.
  11. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    Speaking to a City ST holder earlier and he'd rather they spend 40-50m on Ings than 160m on Kane!!
  12. Perhaps it still is.
  13. Thought so but your phrasing wasn't clear enough to portray that.
  14. Know for a fact as done or presumption it will? If fact, who to and how much?
  15. I didn't give an opinion on how good he is. I expressed the apparent view of many on here in what was (clearly not obvious enough for you) a sarcastic manner. And if I want to "chat shite" I will do. And you can move on past my posts at your leisure. Over sensitive twat.
  16. Apparently he is so good that we should be distraught at missing out on him. Even though Chelsea don't want him.
  17. Actually it doesn't create a safer environment. Being vaccinated twice simply protects yourself from the severity of covid should you get it. It does prevent you getting it nor does it stop you spreading it. By insisting people are double dosed it merely excludes those who aren't and who "might(but no one knows for sure)" be more severely affected by coronavirus should they contract it.
  18. Doubt Vest is back anyway yet
  19. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    I agree with your overall point but I doubt we will get much over 20m for Ings.
  20. Why not? Interested in your reasons. Have you seen him play alot?
  21. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    Didn't spot him in the latest training video released by the club...🤔🤔🤔🤣🤣🤣
  22. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    I'm not sure they are mutually exclusive situations. I hope he signs but if not I would prefer we sell and replace but I predict he will stay and leave for free next summer, which is not ideal for either party.
  23. Actually we are stronger, by virtue of Romeu being fit. We certainly need strengthening and one or fur need shifting out but you are wrong in regard to the bit in bold.
  24. MarkSFC

    Danny Ings

    Precisely why it's not good for either party as Ralph has been saying and supposedly telling Ings.
×
×
  • Create New...