Unbelievable Jeff

I know, just reacting to the ridiculous notion that he's a **** Andy Carroll.

Utter ********.

Indeed, which was why I said that!

I think Mann will be fine, he's calling someone out for saying something ****ing stupid. The issue for Labour is that it has come from within their own party.

To be fair, Red Ken is an utter nutcase and has been for years, but if you break down what he says he's not completely wrong, certainly from a historical standpoint...not that he should have said it. Oh no. Definitely should not have said it. The new old Labour Party. Just when they look to be actually winning some battles, they decide to punch themselves in the crotch. Its as if they actually don't want power and want to sell Corbyn and the far left up the river at the expense of the next election, so that the party will never have to deal with them again ('they had their chance and ****ed it up').

Blimey, I come back for a quick look, and the same suspects are still at it. Don't ever change Alpine, there's too much comedy EVERY time you get it wrong.

Also, where's my swearing? **** it, I'm off to post happy cock faces.

Where's the ****ing 'like' button?

It's not entirely correct, but I have to agree it is rather funny...

That DPS seems like a nice guy...

Blimey, you really are clueless if you think we haven't made money on it! We've remortgaged at £275k more than the purchase price, now on a 50% LTV. Pretty much slashed a third of our mortgage payments, lovely stuff! As we know from previous interactions, you're a compulsive liar who tries to denigrate other peoples arguments by lying. This is the issue I have with you giving this advice, as we never know when you're telling the truth or not.

Sounds like he's as good at checking cars over as you are at giving fiscal advice. 'Personally I wouldnt buy a car of that age, more cost effective to lease imo.' This only works for certain car brands does it, as this statement seemed to be a catch-all. Also, who's talking about 5 year old cars? Surely it was covered under the warranty that he took out. A hope and a prayer? We're talking a two year old car which will be covered in year one by a manufacturers warranty, and then an additional warranty that you added above? Not sure that you've made any point there.

It doesn't cost the same to repair, you pay more as it gets invoiced to you after the car has gone back, and they use their own people. I know someone who had to £4k for a new respray as they had 2 panels keyed. He was obviously not happy. The opportunity cost of money is a pretty ridiculous argument to make, as you haven't factored that into your calculations either. Not sure why we're talking about having European cover, what if these people don't want to take the car abroad. If tyres, discs and brakes last 20k miles, why will the person potentially not have to pay for them while leasing as well? There is every chance that they will, especially if the car is 4wd and definitely if they did it over 3 years. I am about to sell my X1 and get an E class estate. It works out that leasing over 3 years cost an extra £5k. No matter how many sets of tyres, brakes, opportunity cost of the money etc you shove on that, it doesn't even make a dent. Leasing is not more cost effective. It may be a better way to own a car, but it IS NOT more cost effective. The problem I have is you're trying to advise people on spending a lot of money, and giving them misleading information. That is a pretty ****tish thing to do, just to try and prove a point that you know isn't true.

Right of reply here: - You are assuming that the brakes and pads haven't just been replaced, which if you are buying well you would look at and thus negotiate the price down if it needed doing. - As I said above when replying to SO16, I said when paying cash. Not getting a loan. - A lot of cars come with a 5 year warranty so the car would still be under manufacturers warranty in most cases. - Breakdown cover most people get free with their bank account. So, I still make that substantially cheaper, even if you pay for the warranty and that's before you get charged 15p per mile over, and any damage to the car from over-zealous kids, and car park dings...as I said, in general buying a two year old car is more cost-effective than leasing.

If you're paying cash, then it's still cheaper to buy a 2 or 3 year old car (the first two years are the worst for depreciation by far) and then re-sell at the end of the two years, than lease. Of course, if you like having a brand new car, then the extra money may not bother you, but if you want to be cost-effective then this is still the best way to do it.

You're talking **** again Tim, have a look at Autotrader (first one I came across on there for both years): 2013 Nissan XTrail Tekna 2.0 DCI (24000 miles) - £16995 2011 Nissan XTrail Tekna 2.0 DCI (40000 miles) - £14500 Cost of £2445 over two years, not including tax (£3005 after road tax). Not sure why you always think it's more cost effective to lease.

Strange that you have a recurring nightmare about a forum poster, positively weird actually.

Tim Sherwood then...

It might stop people making ridiculously hyperbolic statements though, and that's probably a good thing.

If we sold him we'd get more than £6m. We won't be selling him though.

Been there, wasn't good, won't be back...

I'm not sure if we need a change... I wonder how much of last season was due to the transition from Pochettino. I just don't know anymore. Bring in Bielsa.

To be fair the rabid left are far more politically active - they always have to have something to complain about, and Corbyn is giving them their platform.

How do you 'like' on this site?