sadoldgit

Watching the TV coverage last night and they wheeled out some nice cuddly presenters saying we need larger than life characters like Clarkson on TV. Do we really? What we need are intelligent people who know how to deal with issues that need dealing with. A grown man inhabited by a naughty schoolboy persona isn't a larger than life character. It is part of the dumbing down that he been ruining TV and the general media in this country for several years now. There is an argument to be had about going too far with PC. Making discriminatory jokes doesn't help. Ok, it happened in the 1970s but as we know now, it was wrong then just as it is wrong now.

Just because we have different views about what constitutes excessive force Sarnia, it doesn't mean to say we cant agree on other things!

key

Okay, so where does it say that he was a threat to the officers whilst laying unarmed on the ground? On the basis that he had previous it was ok to shot him? WTF? And yes, New England in the Fall is awesome. So long as you don't get shot but some passing police officer

Guys, let us not lose any sleep of the fate of poor old Jeezer. He will continue to peddle his thoughts via his Sun column and he will make programmes for SKY so he will not be short of a few bob. And for many he will be a hero because he stood up to the mighty BBC, made racist and homophobic remarks and hit some poor sod for not providing him with some food. What a f*cking hero.

Yes. But there doesn't seem to be much doubt that he hit this other guy and this is not rule of law it is an internal issue. Interesting that so many people want to defend him when no one seems to deny that he hit someone. How many people have signed the petition? Its ok. Its only Jeremy. We all love him because he is rooted in the 1970s anti PC shtick and that is so cool. Batman, if someone hit someone else on your Sub would that be okay by you? Would they be in the brig or still strutting around the poop deck or whatever the hell it is they have on subs? The bloke is captured on camera making that crass slope joke, muttering the n word, using the provocative number plate etc. But he is so cool because he is giving it to the man that we cant touch him for assaulting a colleague? If he is not guilty I am sure he will be back on our screens with his playful pranks soon, so don't fret. The saddest thing here is that the people who signed his petition don't seem to give a stuff about what he may or may not have done, they just want that bloody awful programme back on the TV.

There have been a number of reports and clearly his bosses feel that he has a case to answer as he is the only one suspended. I am sure there is a very good reason for it though - just as he didn't know that there was an Asian guy on the bridge when he made his slope comment, he had no idea about the car number plate in Argentina etc etc.

Yep, clearly if you don't arrange food when a superstar wants it you deserve to get a smack in the face. Sadly you are right though, the Clarkson apologists are out in force.

Even his mate said he did it so it looks very likely that he did doesn't it?

SKY and Clarkson are made for each other. Also for all those people supporting Clarkson over this, would you feel the same if it was you he punched just because you hadn't arranged some food?

WTF? That's one minute and thirty nine seconds of my life I'll never get back again.

typhoo

It is amazing the affect a wig, some lippy and a bikini can do for a guy!

Maybe the word "slope" has fallen out of usuage so much since the Vietnamese War but I know what it meant and I am sure others do to. Clarkson knows what he is doing.

yeast

pop

I would also like to take credit for many of the hot totty pictures from the 60s to the 80s on previous threads.

lips

Yes it is Bern BBB. And you are quite right, I have crossed swords with the best!

That really is very sweet of you CL but it will screw my credibility with C B Fry and Alpine, both of whom think I talk b*llocks all of the time.

Bless you PB. Hugs all round x

I do not agree with this either. I have had problems with my ex. She remarried someone who eaens over £150,000 a year and still came after me for CSA payments even though I used to spend a fortune on the kids. Once the divorce settlement is done that should be it. You have to draw a line somewhere. If there are no children involved I can see no reason why the ex wife should not support herself.

how?

luke

Players come, players go. The trick is to replace with similar or better. If players don't want to be here I'd rather replace them with players that do.