OldNick
Subscribed Users-
Posts
24,569 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by OldNick
-
how much do you have to put on to win £700 on a saints defeat?
-
yes, but overall our performance was good, and we look to be improving. When do we stop changing managers, you know my thoughts on Puel and look where that got us
-
perhaps I can see we are better under Hughes than MP. Keep getting rid of the manager can’t always be the way. As for Brighton if McCarthy had come and collected the cross we would have won. The same squad under a different manager, can’t see it changing things. I didn’t want Hughes but we seem to have been a bit better the last few games
-
well the can’t shoot is not right. You have an issue with the lad so there is no cure for you. The player has tried his best to improve and so called fans can’t be arsed to give some slack
-
So in 3 years you have earned an average of £60 a week. An outlay of £30k I would suggest. Better returns putting crap on eBay I would have thought
-
lol. We all can be James Bond on the internet
-
you obviously didn’t see the great saves the Leicester keeper and de gear made then
-
lol to those Puel haters it has gone full circle. To be fair anyone who can turn us into a defensive unit will have to have superpowers.
-
What type of football do his teams play? I do hope this is a good decision, too much like the season we went down before with changing of managers
-
Don’t you think it’s another risk though? It didn’t look to me that the players have lost their fight for the manager
-
We get what we deserve as a club. It seems wrong to me as the team seem to be giving it all for the manager. Flores will still have the same squad to work with and the players have to adapt to a new system. As it is Guan and Billy giving the clues it probably is right
-
friendly bit of advice, you are obviously staking a decent amount to there, if you win it is not life changing but go on a losing run it is life changing. Bring your stake down to a fiver, and you still can get the feeling of beating the bookie
-
Comments like that just show how foolish al out of our fan base is. I’m surprised in you Andy. He was made MOM by neutrals who watch the game without negative views beforehand.
-
I didn't think he coached at all, it was his backroom staff who do that
-
Can you explain that to me as I don't do betting. You can place money on the favourites to win and then the obvious draw and still come out winning £45 . That is amazing I cant see why bookies actually spend millions advertising
-
Getting rid of Hughes for 10m will still leave us without the goalscorer. If you spend that 10m on a forward it may be better
-
The club cannot afford to pay10m to get rid apparently. The performances are not showing the players are not committed. We are still paying for Reed and co not replacing Pelle and Mane with a goalscorer. The guff that CA was the replacement still boils in me, we needed him as a backup and at least one other to fill the loss of 40+ goals they provided. Iam not a great fan of Hughes but we cant keep changing the managers as it is all start again everytime. Get in a goalscorer and we will be fine, especially if he can get the back line sorted. We are not playing poorly just not clinical. It was apt that our forward missed the vital penalty
-
how does that work then
-
Just shows how ridiculous it is , as far as I’m concerned it is still human error
-
VAR is as good as our black box , it depends who is assessing the info
-
That’s Saints luck. That looks like Roger East who happened to be the ref when Watford scored the blatant handball last season. No VAR then
-
He’ll cash in , cash out , and do some wonder bet that wins
-
Surely someone who is such a judge would have placed the bet on before now
-
That is why you can’t have the lad playing in the PL.
