OldNick

but he's not a white blue eyed boy and speaks in a funny language. The point is was it rascist? In todays society i get confused what is and what is not

No he's Brazilian although with hair.....

I myself dont worry but did wonder if the boot was on the other foot.Ima white honky and dont care what Im called, although terms of disrespect like fooish, stupid and dinlo may do so. I await the following barrage, lol

The Brazilian PM? If so no, he is as most Brazilian people are coloured.Definately brown eyed.

Today i saw a speech on Sky by the brazillian PM saying that the banking crisis was brought on by white skinned people with blue eyes.In this day and age ahould we be outraged as a racist attack or does it not count?

BTF we had a series of posts regarding this some months ago.You posted at the time along the lines that there was no regulation taken away. You also made it known that GB was an aquaintence. I love the way if it is a Tory it is sleaze but as soon as a Labour MP is seen to play the game its lets wait and see. We all know the whole lot are using loopholes to earn a little extra.I cannot see how an MP needs to have expenses on his parents home when he has a perfectly good one only 8 miles away. sadly by making excuses rather than being outraged or even a tad unhappy you are letting them hide away behind yet another enquiry. Again it is basically self regulation something that got us into the banking mess in the first place. The more that these people are allowed to bend the rules the more that the people will not have faith in the system. As for rooking the system well paying for your parents home on a technicality is no different IMO. My daughter lives in London, perhaps I should claim expenses saying that i have to work up there sometimes, I may get it all back.

You still wont accept that by taking away the BOE's powers when they came to power was not a stupid decision.May i add that it was obvious that the debt we were taking on personally was only going to end in tears. The government should have taken measures earlier and it has now been suggested that 4 years ago Blair and Brown were warned about it. May I also ask how you explain McNulty's conduct in drawing expenses on his parents house even though he had another only 8 miles away.I accept the Tories have had a few doing bad things but you came to power as anti sleaze, please explain the difference?

If you knew the circumstances you would be confident. They do know the law but so does my barrister who is an specialist on these things.There again i suppose he didn't go to uni for 5 years and work in an office for 2 lol.

A little bit of irony there, me thinks.

I dont have skyplus, and if I did i dont think they would be that keen on me watching the 1970's Big match at 8 o'clock at night. Anyway as I said watching credits made me all sentimenatl.

I myself am sceptical but if he saw that it was a necessity to win some games to keep us afloat and his investment then perhaps.I also wonder that if it was seen that he was paying for Saga fans would jump on him about the whole loaning the players out in the first place.Like i say sceptical but not 100% sure it is not the case.

Well as Im running a business it is not that easy to to sit down and watch the tv at those times. I dont read every thread and although I was at the 1979 fianl and a very good day I had too.As we lost I wasn't that keen to watch.

Wow, can we touch you? The 'Laws of football' dictate that if you don't adhere to them you pay the consequences. Perhaps my wording 'law' was too complicated or I didn't word it so you could understand. Mr Plod doesn't come and arrest you if you don't comply with the leagues rules. They can stop you entering their competition and whilst unlikely it would be stupid to risk and what is the point anyway? If you don't take notice of the planning guidelines( you may dress it up as building control or any other agency you wish, but the fundamentals are that if you don't comply you don't get the permission.) you will have a fight. I myself at present have had to appoint a barrister regarding a dispute with the council regarding prescriptive rights that has gone to the land registry for arbitration, and so incur costs. They can get very costly of course. The case is that the club built the stadium on the information given to them that would make it proceed at its speeediest as well as taking into account the safety issues. Tell us why the club lied or why else they would put such a gap between the pitch and fans? Unemployed Lol

As I put all in my opinion of course

Watched it last night on ITV and thought it was great. Seeing the credits for the Big Match took me back to the 'good old days'

I dont bother with the ignore button as I might miss something intelligent or constructive one day. Wilde would not be here if it wasn't for jokers like you who fell for his talk hook line and sinker.By now a proper alternative would have arrived and RL would have been ousted and our finances may well not have pushed us to this.All opinion of course but the fact is that the day the fans who wanted 'anyone but Lowe' have brought the situation upon us and so we have him back. Yes I accept his financial judgement but that is because i had no faith in the lot that replaced him last time. ps. ity is the very anti Lowes who have to resort to the ignore button as they dont like the truth.

There is nothing wrong if feeling that way, i just believe you are totally wrong and we will move on.

So the choice is to try and stay up and then avoid administration, or take it now and try and get promoted.Either way is very risky.I myself am happy to try and stay up,and i still think we will.

Its OK OSM you keep with the cheap comments. It was fans like you who allowed the Wilde bunch in the first place, who instead of moving the club on have put us in a worse position than when they arrived. You may think you have the moral high ground but you aint And if you really believe that MC is the one to run the club then you are a REALLY bad judge.

I did not look if you were as somebody as careful as you would make sure before putting up such a big wager. http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=9838&highlight=administration I can't be bothered to find anymore, there are so many threads on it. In this particular one there is a poll, you know the things that people get to vote yes or no on here. Well there were 92 who wanted us to go into admiistration and 162 who didnt . Now that is a large percentage who are members on here who do wish to go into it. As you have asked me to come up with the goods and i have noiw delivered, now answr the question I put to you a couple of weeks back where you didn't answer. Give us a list of all those investors you said that werre out there that Rl was stopping investing.

I can see easter has come early for you as you now can put loads of different emotions up. LM or LC by chance, or were the hearts from a lady at the club?

You started it.

I agree, but some believe he will be hurt by it.I think he is a wealthy man in his own right and whilst it will hurt he wont lose much money.What it will hurt is his pride and that i believe is more important to him than the money.

Richmond saint springs to mind, ...has...been..calling...for ...it for..months. there are others who have put their keeness to go into administration as it will in their minds get rid of RL and think he will lose money.I wont help for me to mention user names as they will get all upset and i dont wish for that.Have you argued in favour of it? I wouldn't be surprised.