Secret Site Agent

Right, well that's him in the team tomorrow. By end of january our backline will be Argent, a sperm, an overy and a twinkl in a daddies eye. Sorry, tired, still at work, ****ed off that I can't go tomorrow.

I've got to ask this though, Wes. What you are saying is that to get fans back, Lowe and Wilde have to leave, to get fans back. Sorry, I don't get it.

Well done. That really put it into context I feel. i like the cut of your jib, Tiggs, Lad.

3-2 to us because I have the devil in me tonight.

I actually said this a few weeks ago, (i had a lightbulb moment during my lunch) and got shouted down, so i am going to play devils advacate. No, he is wrong, Lowe is happy to go bvankrupt and drive us all out the SMS as revenge for ousting him so that he can stand over a pile of ashes and say, 'I ****ing taught you lot a lesson, didn't I.' And I aint going to go any more because that is what lowe wants and I am only lining his pocket, so I am going to stay away and not support my team and I wont be happy until we are in the Blue square league and we have gone bankrupt. There, I have said the ****, now no one has to come on and spout it. Let the Cohesive, cogent, constructive well thougth out debate begin. I'll start. I think we SHOULD try, where we can, to get a stay-away to come back. We are not lining his pockets, but are ensuring the future of the club we love. I don't like, and still don't forgive Lowe, or Wilde, for what they have done, and I would like to see the back of them both, but lets not cut off our noses to spite our faces. If you can't afford it, fine. If you can't make it, fine. If you would rather cut the grass, or paint your fence, then OK. But if you are not going just because of Lord Lowe, WTF, best mate? Why, answer me that. And remember the Three 'C''s, (and the WT as well.)

Sorry, don't like to disagree but it is still related. I bet we still boo on Saturday our loverly youthful chaps,don't really give a **** about cole, just wanted honest opinion about why do it, that's all. Can I have a rant and rave if people start talking about saints now and demand it to be put back on the main board, if that's ok? Just don't boo our players, it's a ****ty thing to do and you are a ***** if you do.

Because it corresponds with what we do with OUR players. So can I suggest you bring it back on topic with your opinion on wether we should boo our players, wether it is constructive, wether we should stamp it out. Please discuss.

Why, the booing of AC has started a debate on the moral of booing our team. Sorry TG.

Listening to the England Game the commentators ALL pilloried the booing of Ashley Cole. Basically they said that he made a mistake and what do the 'Fans' believe they are accomplishing by booing him. I thought to myself, 'We do that to our own players'. So, if the professional pundits believe this is non-constructive and 'deplorable' behaviour to someone on the international stage, what would they think of us? Is it time, maybe that we kept our displeasure to the end of the game? Stop the booing when it can inpact on performance? Basically, better more experienced footballing heads than mine are discusted with the booing, should we stamp it out for our youngsters? I am really interested in your opinion, so remember only constructive, cogent debate, please.

I hear he has commisioned an episode of 'Who do you think you are' in the hope of finding out the a certain J Write has Scots ancestors Aledgedly

Burley being interviewed on 5 Live, 'Played with passion' 'Better team on the day had most chances' 'Unlucky not to score' 'xxxxxxxxx is playing well but just didn't manage to pull it off' I think he must read them from the book, '101 different reasons for not winning - Soundbytes to the press to get the fans off your back and keep your job for another week' by Graham Taylor, available for 99p from a bargin bin at any reputable bookshop. Good win by England by the way but from the sound of it, a bit dodgy in the first half, and the first 15 mins of the second.

Hey I just set mine Cool

They are the bastards that made the terminator. I just knew it, Judgement day is here. Quick, where is Sarah Conner...... What's that officer? Have I seen this boy? No, I ............No,No, Don't...I....AAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH. And relax.

Bloody hell. Were all doomed.

Do you know the problem with you Spike? Caravan Envy

I reckon a 2-1 myself to us, with at least one goal coming from nowhere and being spectacular. And on Monday I will ring up that Jon Gaunt to gloat on the radio.

Thanks. Too many web pages open, thought I was already there.

'Portsmouth intend to make an official complaint to the Football Association over insults aimed at Sol Campbell by Spurs fans at Fratton Park last Sunday.' 'When interviewed, the 34-year-old club captain said," I can live with the abuse for leaving Tottenham, and the racial abuse to a point, but when they called me a Skate, and said I had married my own sister, I knew they had gone too far.' In a statement Portsmouth said: "Both Sol and the club feel no player should be subjected to personal abuse of this nature and that it has no place in football. What a man wishes to do with a fish in the comfort of his own home is his affair.' 'When approached for a comment, manager Harry Redknap stated, '..How much you willing to pay me for the interview'. Allegedly. Which brings me to the serious point of my thread. Slagging of ex-players, is there a point, is it justified or is it all just a lot of hot air. Should it be tollerated? Or is there nothing wrong with a bit of banter to the ex-hero. I know we have had our words rammed down our throats recently. Remember, clear, concise, coherent, well thought out constructive arguments only please.

I am glad to concede the point. I can only speak from experience in relation to the ones I have come across who, I have no doubt, couldn't hold a candle to your good selves. My quip about Tescos and the recruitment company et al are true though, and he wasted a lot of money that my company happily took from the PCT, basically due to arrogance.

Thank **** she hasn't been done for soliciting. Not that I know anything about that. Apparently.

ha ha lmfao

I want into that. They must have been smoking some Grade A class A. So mango chutney purple monkey dishwasher. And a rinky dinky dink to you too.

I have dealt with the hospitals too, (if you remember how the parking was in the General, and then it changed in 2001, that was me. Sorry.), and I must say, what a bunch of total indiots. I wouldn't trust them with my daughters money box, let alone public spends. They want it all for next to nothing, want to change it at the last minute and have us do it for free, then waste a fortune because you have done something and they would prefer it the way it was. so change it back. Then because they don't understand the contract they argue when you present them the final account because they fail to grasp that anything they give you in writing, that we confirm in writing, and they don't dispute is a variation to the contract. It also gets me that the head honchos in the NHS have not 'come up through the ranks' so to speak, and they have their management degrees and three years managing Tescos, or a recruitment firm and think they can run a hospital. In my opinion a few Nurses, Doctors, Cleaners of Porters working their way up, being trained along the way to do the job of management is the way to go. I started at the bottom, and where I am I look up the food chain at my bosses allo the way up to Director level, and they all did my job, and I look down at those that work for me an they will one day do my job. And because of that we ALL have a unique understanding of the job, and this goes to the success of my company. And no more golden goodbye's either. If they **** up, it's out the door onto the jam roll like the rest of us.

But their argument is that they invest millions in developing the drugs, and the money they make they invest in even more beneficial drugs. Then they light their cigar with a fifty and leave in their helicoptor.

I have met Sir Ian Blair a couple of times and I am surprised that he has lasted this long. The man is more left of centre than our present Prime Minister and he is too interested in the politics of the job than catching wrong'uns. I would prefer a more hard nosed Chief Police officer who targets crime and would not tolerate 'no go' zones. Our current encumbant, Paul Kernahan, is like that, and I knew him a good few years ago. Shame he is retiring.