Matty and Turk's Compost Thread

[Weston Super Saint]

1 minute ago, Farmer Saint said:

This thread is great - so many fails all over the place on here from misunderstanding logic gates (there is no absolute on X, it's not Grindr, so not liking a post doesn't mean you dislike it, it can mean you are ambivalent to it, you may not even be able to read it in it's native language), to a like conversion rate of less than 1% being considered anything but abysmal.

It really shows what the human mind is capable of 🙄

In all seriousness, everyone involved should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

In all seriousness, some people shouldn't take some threads too seriously.

Although I do like your comments on logic gates - it's only me that's mentioned them and you have me on ignore, or did you forget that?

[Farmer Saint]

35 of 42.

Like shooting fish in a barrel. Obsessed.

Edited April 21 by Farmer Saint

[Matthew Le God]

54 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Writing 15k+ posts doesn't in any way mean I read 100s as you claim.

Plenty of posters on here post without reading what others write.

Another MLG fail.

 

Read the third sentence in the posted you quoted.

[Weston Super Saint]

2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

Read the third sentence in the posted you quoted.

Read the second sentence of the post you quoted.

Quod, erat, demonstrandum.

Edited April 21 by Weston Super Saint

[Matthew Le God]

6 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Read the second sentence of the post you quoted.

Quod, erat, demonstrandum.

Epic fail on your part here!

The sentence I mentioned voids that!

In your 15k+ posts you have quoted many hundreds of other people. Why are you quoting them if you haven't read what they said?

[egg]

1 hour ago, Farmer Saint said:

This thread is great - so many fails all over the place on here from misunderstanding logic gates (there is no absolute on X, it's not Grindr, so not liking a post doesn't mean you dislike it, it can mean you are ambivalent to it, you may not even be able to read it in it's native language), to a like conversion rate of less than 1% being considered anything but abysmal.

It really shows what the human mind is capable of 🙄

In all seriousness, everyone involved should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

Err. You're involved. Or are you referring to the few people who liked MLG's tweet? 

[Farmer Saint]

1 minute ago, egg said:

Err. You're involved. Or are you referring to the few people who liked MLG's tweet? 

Am I? I commented on the thread being ridiculous, but wouldn't call that being involved, just commentating.

[Weston Super Saint]

1 hour ago, Matthew Le God said:

Epic fail on your part here!

The sentence I mentioned voids that!

In your 15k+ posts you have quoted many hundreds of other people. Why are you quoting them if you haven't read what they said?

Ah, the penny finally drops.

Well done Matthew, it's been a struggle but you got there in the end.

[Matthew Le God]

1 hour ago, egg said:

Err. You're involved. Or are you referring to the few people who liked MLG's tweet? 

354 isn't a 'few people'

[Matthew Le God]

41 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Ah, the penny finally drops.

Well done Matthew, it's been a struggle but you got there in the end.

So you read posts, quote them, comment about those quotes without actually reading them? 

[Turkish]

11 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

354 isn't a 'few people'

Oh dear with 41.3k views now that means your “liked” percentage is dropping like a stone you are hovering just over 0.75% now, bad times 

also I noticed you have 46 comments meaning an even tinier percentage bothered to articulate a response to your post and many of these did not support it

A sample of the replies were 

“let it fucking go”

”tragic”

”he’s gone move on”

Which makes your mantra of just because people didn’t respond doesn’t mean they don’t like it

A disaster of a tweet

Edited April 21 by Turkish

[Matthew Le God]

53 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Oh dear with 41.3k views now that means your “liked” percentage is dropping like a stone you are hovering just over 0.75% now, bad times 

also I noticed you have 46 comments meaning an even tinier percentage bothered to articulate a response to your post and many of these did not support it

A sample of the replies were 

“let it fucking go”

”tragic”

”he’s gone move on”

Which makes your mantra of just because people didn’t respond doesn’t mean they don’t like it

A disaster of a tweet

Yet again, nonsense.

Yet another Turkish strawman fallacy!

At no point did I say more people agreed with it than didn't. The Tweet even opens with saying it will divide the fanbase! I was fully aware some wouldn't want him back, so you decide to ignore the caveat.

I note you only list quotes of three that disagree and make no mention of the many that do. How convenient!

Edited April 21 by Matthew Le God

[Turkish]

7 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

Yet again, nonsense.

Yet another Turkish strawman fallacy!

At no point did I say more people agreed with it than didn't. The Tweet even opens with saying it will divide the fanbase! I was fully aware some wouldn't want him back, so you decide to ignore the caveat.

I note you only list quotes of three that disagree and make no mention of the many that do. How convenient!

I didn’t say you did

57 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Which makes your mantra of just because people didn’t respond doesn’t mean they don’t like it

👆This is what I actually said - something you stated several times on this thread 

another fail 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

Edited April 21 by Turkish

[Matthew Le God]

5 minutes ago, Turkish said:

I didn’t say you did

👆This is what I actually said - something you stated several times on this thread 

another fail 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

That quote you just used does not hold any water. The comment section does no such thing. Sure a handful are against it in the comments, I did not claim overtime. You leave out all those in favour in the comments. 

[Turkish]

2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

That quote you just used does not hold any water. The comment section does no such thing. Sure a handful are against it in the comments, I did not claim overtime. You leave out all those in favour in the comments. 

Of course it holds water, it’s real evidence people disagree with you. Far more compelling evidence than you trying to convince people that even though less than 1% showed support for you post, plenty other might have they just didn’t show it 😂😂😂😂

[Matthew Le God]

9 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Of course it holds water, it’s real evidence people disagree with you. Far more compelling evidence than you trying to convince people that even though less than 1% showed support for you post, plenty other might have they just didn’t show it 😂😂😂😂

At no point did I say people did not disagree with it. You picked three coments against it. No mention of those in favour.

You have no idea what the other 99% think. Nor do I. Try harder Turkish! Slacking!

[Turkish]

Just now, Matthew Le God said:

At no point did I say people did not disagree with it. You picked three coments against it. No mention of those in favour.

You have no idea what the other 99% think. Nor do I. Try harder Turkish! Slacking!

Neither do you yet it didn’t stop you claiming that just because they didn’t like it they might agree 😂😂😂😂😂

MLGs posts ❌❌❌❌❌

❌ Fail

[Matthew Le God]

12 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Neither do you yet it didn’t stop you claiming that just because they didn’t like it they might agree 😂😂😂😂😂

MLGs posts ❌❌❌❌❌

❌ Fail

You make this far too easy!

People might appreciate or agree with a post but choose not to engage for various reasons: they’re scrolling quickly, they’re being cautious about how their activity appears to others (especially with controversial topics), or they simply don’t use the “like” feature much. Liking something and hitting the like button are not the same thing — one is a private feeling, the other is a public action.

Not hitting the like button on a tweet is like laughing at a joke at home but not clapping at the comedy club — it doesn't mean you didn't enjoy it, just that your hands stayed in your lap.

[Turkish]

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

You make this far too easy!

People might appreciate or agree with a post but choose not to engage for various reasons: they’re scrolling quickly, they’re being cautious about how their activity appears to others (especially with controversial topics), or they simply don’t use the “like” feature much. Liking something and hitting the like button are not the same thing — one is a private feeling, the other is a public action.

Not hitting the like button on a tweet is like laughing at a joke at home but not clapping at the comedy club — it doesn't mean you didn't enjoy it, just that your hands stayed in your lap.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

liking a tweet from someone saying they want a certain football manager at their football club is far too controversial to reveal in the public domain 

this is brilliant 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Fail ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

[Matthew Le God]

1 minute ago, Turkish said:

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

liking a tweet from someone saying they want a certain football manager at their football club is far too controversial to reveal in the public domain 

this is brilliant 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Fail ❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌

Still making this too easy! Try harder!

Turkish can't grasp context... again!

I was talking in general regarding reasons why people don't hit the heart button on Tweets. The controversial comment was not about this tweet per se.

That is why I said "with a post" and not "with this post". Because it was talking in general and was one of a few reasons. There is a key difference between the two that you missed!

Plus... interesting you ignored the analogy at the end!

[Matthew Le God]

@Turkish and I must have enough compost to grow a lot of vegetables in the Saints Web garden!

Which of us is Richard Briers and who is Felicity Kendal?

Edited April 21 by Matthew Le God

[badgerx16]

29 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

@Turkish and I must have enough compost to grow a lot of vegetables in the Saints Web garden!

Which of us is Richard Briers and who is Felicity Kendal?

More like Margo and Jerry.

[Turkish]

1 hour ago, Matthew Le God said:

Still making this too easy! Try harder!

Turkish can't grasp context... again!

I was talking in general regarding reasons why people don't hit the heart button on Tweets. The controversial comment was not about this tweet per se.

That is why I said "with a post" and not "with this post". Because it was talking in general and was one of a few reasons. There is a key difference between the two that you missed!

Plus... interesting you ignored the analogy at the end!

So you agree then that in the context you mention responding to a post about a football manager isn’t controversial or a strong reason to keep those opinions away from the public domain. So we can also agree this is not a reason as to why only slightly over 0.75% of the people who saw it responded.
 

Now you’re getting it MLG 👍👏👏

[Sarnia Cherie]

12 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

 

 

Rolf Harris!!! That's the most appropriate analogy you can come up with? 

[beatlesaint]

3 minutes ago, Sarnia Cherie said:

Rolf Harris!!! That's the most appropriate analogy you can come up with? 

There’s his effort at humour falling flat 🤣

[Matthew Le God]

14 minutes ago, Sarnia Cherie said:

Rolf Harris!!! That's the most appropriate analogy you can come up with? 

 

10 minutes ago, beatlesaint said:

There’s his effort at humour falling flat 🤣

Did you watch the video or just read the title?

The video has nothing to do with him being disgraced. That episode is from 2002, 11 years before he was arrested.

Edited yesterday at 16:56 by Matthew Le God

[Turkish]

10 minutes ago, beatlesaint said:

There’s his effort at humour falling flat 🤣

yet again 😂

I see he had to explain his joke again, 3rd time this week 😂

[Matthew Le God]

4 minutes ago, Turkish said:

yet again 😂

I see he had to explain his joke again, 3rd time this week 😂

I made no joke, I posted a video. Why can't you grasp the difference? That is not me making a joke! Yet another Turkish fail! When I hear the phrase 'Bouncing Back' I think of the famous Alan Partridge episode about his book called... 'Bouncing Back'.

Edited yesterday at 17:01 by Matthew Le God

[Turkish]

Just now, Matthew Le God said:

I made no joke, I posted a video. Why can't you grasp the difference? That is not me making a joke! Yet another Turkish fail! When I hear the phrase 'Bouncing Back' I think of the famous Alan Partridge episode about his book called... 'Bouncing Back'.

and then edited your post explaining it removing the word "joke" 

this is brilliant 

😂😂😂😂😂

[Matthew Le God]

1 minute ago, Turkish said:

and then edited your post explaining it removing the word "joke" 

this is brilliant 

😂😂😂😂😂

That video is a scene from an episode about Alan Partridge 'Bouncing Back', that's all. No joke written by me in that video. Time after time, your comprehension skills let you down.

Edited yesterday at 17:01 by Matthew Le God

[Turkish]

Just now, Matthew Le God said:

That video is a scene from an episode about Alan Partridge 'Bouncing Back', that's all. No joke written by me in that video. Time after time, your comprehension skills let you down.

Did you or did you not remove the word "joke" from your original post explaining why you posted it?

 

[Matthew Le God]

3 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Did you or did you not remove the word "joke" from your original post explaining why you posted it?

Not in the context you are looking for. No joke written by me in that video. All I did was post a video with no words. No joke written by me. Time after time, your comprehension skills let you down. Posting a video of other people's jokes, is not me making a joke. Why can't you grasp that?

Edited yesterday at 17:07 by Matthew Le God

[Turkish]

Just now, Matthew Le God said:

 No joke written by me in that video. All I did was post a video with no words. No joke written by me. Time after time, your comprehension skills let you down. Posting a video of other people's jokes, is not me making a joke. Why can't you grasp that?

That wasn't the question.

Did you include the word joke when you explained why you posted it, then edited the post 1 minute after i posted saying that you were explaining yet another attempt at humour removing the word "joke" from your post? 

Yes or no.

[Matthew Le God]

1 minute ago, Turkish said:

That wasn't the question.

Did you include the word joke when you explained why you posted it, then edited the post 1 minute after i posted saying that you were explaining yet another attempt at humour removing the word "joke" from your post? 

Yes or no.

No, not in the context you are looking for. But you have shown time after time for many years that you don't understand context.

Edited yesterday at 17:09 by Matthew Le God

[Turkish]

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

No, not in the context you are looking for. But you have shown time after time for many years that you don't understand context.

So you did then,

another attempt at humour you had to explain i hope you can bounce back from this 😂

[Matthew Le God]

3 minutes ago, Turkish said:

So you did then,

another attempt at humour you had to explain i hope you can bounce back from this 😂

Yet another Turkish fail at not understanding context and that posting a video of a set of jokes written by others is not a joke by the poster. It is simply what the phrase reminds people of. Come on Turkish, this is basic stuff.

[Turkish]

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

Yet another Turkish fail at not understanding context and that posting a video of a set of jokes written by others is not a joke by the poster. It is simply what the phrase reminds people of. Come on Turkish, this is basic stuff.

You had to explain why you posted it. Another attempt at humour, another time you had to explain what it meant. 

Failed again. Bounce back soon MLG ❤️

[Matthew Le God]

4 minutes ago, Turkish said:

You had to explain why you posted it. Another attempt at humour, another time you had to explain what it meant. 

Failed again. Bounce back soon MLG ❤️

Yet another comprehension fail by you. I explained the reason for the post was due to the phrase 'Bouncing back' reminding me of an episode of an old show. The post of a video and a video alone was a reminder to people, with no further comment on my part. Do better Turkish.

Edited yesterday at 17:23 by Matthew Le God

[coalman]

[skintsaint]

This thread has gone beyond bouncing back.

[lambtiss]

 

I couldn't give a flying fuck which of you is correct, but I do know you are spoiling this thread. 

[Matthew Le God]

Just now, coalman said:

Even though I win time after time, due to Turkish not understanding English. No one really wins... 😉

[Oldandtired]

Ffs get a room you two..,

Edited yesterday at 17:27 by Oldandtired

[Colinjb]

Will you two just go away and f**k already?

[Turkish]

Just now, Matthew Le God said:

Yet another comprehension fail by you. I explained the reason was due to the phrase reminding me of an episode of an old show. The post of a video and a video alone was a reminder to people, with no further comment on my part. Do better Turkish.

Yes which you described as a joke and which you shared as an attempt at humour. You then quickly edited your post as you were so embarrassed about having to explain another one, instead pretending you didn't post it as a joke and simply reminded you of a TV show. The only thing funnier than you having to explain another attempt at humour fail is that you're so embarrassed about it you're now editing post and lying to cover it up 😂

 

 

[Turkish]

2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

Even though I win time after time, due to Turkish not understanding English. No one really wins... 😉

lol you have NEVER beaten me.

15 years, 15 years undefeated

15 years, 15 years i say

15 years 15 years undefeated

Owning MLG the Turkish way

[Matthew Le God]

2 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Yes which you described as a joke and which you shared as an attempt at humour. You then quickly edited your post as you were so embarrassed about having to explain another one, instead pretending you didn't post it as a joke and simply reminded you of a TV show. The only thing funnier than you having to explain another attempt at humour fail is that you're so embarrassed about it you're now editing post and lying to cover it up 😂

Bullshit! Stop lying.

[Matthew Le God]

6 minutes ago, Oldandtired said:

Ffs get a room you two..,

 

6 minutes ago, Colinjb said:

Will you two just go away and f**k already?

I caught myself a @Turkish

[Turkish]

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

Bullshit! Stop lying.

why did you edit your post removing the word "joke" 1 minute after i posted?

Come on MLG just admit it, you know what you did, you realised you'd get pelters for it so edited it hoping no one would notice, sadly for you they did.

Anyway, having beaten you once again i'll let the good folk of saintsweb carry on with the discussion and i'll see you once this latest lot of wounds have healed from another mauling. 

 

[Matthew Le God]

7 minutes ago, Turkish said:

lol you have NEVER beaten me.

15 years, 15 years undefeated

15 years, 15 years i say

15 years 15 years undefeated

Owning MLG the Turkish way

So are you saying I won 2007 to 2010, or was that a draw? 🤔😉