Jump to content

Le tissier on solent: says Lowe must accept some of the blame.


Mr X
 Share

Recommended Posts

Are you listening Lowe? be a man and admit you played a part in our downfall.

He did in all his tv and prss interviews when he said all should shoulder some of the blame.He didnt make that the main part of his thrust I'll grant you.he has as much trouble saying sorry as Gordon brown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[/b]

 

Ain't going to happen,let it go fella..;)

 

Yeah I know sorry it just winds me up that he cant be man enough to admit some blame, I dont believe he is solely responsible but I believe his crazy appointments have been a major factor in our demise, would it hurt to show the fans a little humility?

 

Yep i have to forget and move on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I know sorry it just winds me up that he cant be man enough to admit some blame, I dont believe he is solely responsible but I believe his crazy appointments have been a major factor in our demise, would it hurt to show the fans a little humility?

 

Yep i have to forget and move on

 

To any normal person,no,but this is Rupert Lowe we are talking about.

 

Too add,i concur with your sentiments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least that is more balanced who did MLT think should also shoulder some of the responsibility for our fate?

I havent read the whole article but i think it says 'he should take some of the blame.'Which is something that i have and I suggest most of us have said all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I havent read the whole article but i think it says 'he should take some of the blame.'Which is something that i have and I suggest most of us have said all along.

 

Exactly Nick but its almost as though he is taking the full hit to deflect the attention from others and that is unacceptable and without doubt the reason Lowe went on his post admin media round. To a man none of us would have done anything any different had we been in Lowe's position of trial by a kangaroo court. I hope MLT at least has the sense to make comment on where else he feels the club went wrong and who should be accountable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you listening Lowe? be a man and admit you played a part in our downfall.

 

Mr X will you be sending about 5,000 emails to our alledged supporters who made Mr Wilde look more visible? Don't forget a special email to Wilde and Crouch whilst you're at it but I suspect you can look closer to home for a prime example of a scapegoat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently there's an article on the FA website saying that if Lowe admits blame we'll get a 10 point bonus.

 

I can understand why you want it so much.

 

 

So this man, who apparently has a genuine affection for the club won't even profer a pretend apology in order for the club to gain 10 points when it is in danger of being relegated?

 

Unbelievable.

 

And people wonder why he's unpopular.

 

:mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't enjoy the relative success then of 1997 through to 2004?

 

I was making a little joke - something I know you find conceptually obscure.

 

Tell me, is there any subject, other than Lowe, on which you post?

 

Just seems odd to me: someone with your track record wanting to be so strongly associated with a character so infused with failure and desperate hubris.

 

Cut him loose and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see what difference a mea culpa it will make to our current predicament.

 

For the record this is what he said (various variations of this):

 

"Lowe believes the responsibility for Saints' predicament must be shared by all

at the club.

 

He added: 'Everybody who has been involved in the club, whether that's the board, everybody, has to bear a little bit of the blame.'"

 

Personally I think that is true, and I know I am in the minority, but why should one person accept the blame? He hasn't missed two penalties in a game for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see what difference a mea culpa it will make to our current predicament.

 

For the record this is what he said (various variations of this):

 

"Lowe believes the responsibility for Saints' predicament must be shared by all

at the club.

 

He added: 'Everybody who has been involved in the club, whether that's the board, everybody, has to bear a little bit of the blame.'"

 

Personally I think that is true, and I know I am in the minority, but why should one person accept the blame? He hasn't missed two penalties in a game for example.

 

Wrong!!!

 

He belives and has said so that everyone else is to blame and accepts

none for himself...

 

Maybe, just maybe if the arrogant **** accepted some responsibility

people could move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr X will you be sending about 5,000 emails to our alledged supporters who made Mr Wilde look more visible? Don't forget a special email to Wilde and Crouch whilst you're at it but I suspect you can look closer to home for a prime example of a scapegoat.

 

WTF the thread is about Le Tissiers comments on solent not mine, I have already stated in a previous post above that Lowe is not 100% to blame but must take his fair share so whats with the scapegoat comment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see what difference a mea culpa it will make to our current predicament.

 

For the record this is what he said (various variations of this):

 

"Lowe believes the responsibility for Saints' predicament must be shared by all

at the club.

 

He added: 'Everybody who has been involved in the club, whether that's the board, everybody, has to bear a little bit of the blame.'"

 

Personally I think that is true, and I know I am in the minority, but why should one person accept the blame? He hasn't missed two penalties in a game for example.

 

True.

 

Those fans that destabilised the club after their protests to reinstate Glenn Hoddle in 2004 should also look at themselves and finally admit their part in the downfall of the club instead of deflecting it on to others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True.

 

Those fans that destabilised the club after their protests to reinstate Glenn Hoddle in 2004 should also look at themselves and finally admit their part in the downfall of the club instead of deflecting it on to others.

 

:lol:

 

alanpartridge01.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did in all his tv and prss interviews when he said all should shoulder some of the blame.He didnt make that the main part of his thrust I'll grant you.he has as much trouble saying sorry as Gordon brown

 

He didn't say that he should shoulder most of the blame though, did he.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My view, fwiw (and I know it has all been said before but I am going to put it anyway), the downfall can be put fairly and squarely at the failure to invest in the summer of 2002.

 

Cup finalists, decent league finish and UEFA qualification - if that isn't an ideal time to invest then I don't know what is. This shortsightedness also resulted in WGS leaving.

 

And who's decision/fault was that - LOWE, LOWE and LOWE'S. No one else's - he was/is an autocratic idiot who wouldn't accept anybody's view but his own and was always right.

 

Say what you like but you will not change my view on that.

 

I lay the blame of (likely) League 1 football at his door without a doubt.

 

He has been the downfall of this club and although I believe we will survive the hurt that man has imposed on many decent football loving fan's is outrageous and unforgiveable.

 

You can blame Wilde, Crouch etc but the foundations of this disastrous failure of the club I love were laid by Lowe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly Nick but its almost as though he is taking the full hit to deflect the attention from others and that is unacceptable and without doubt the reason Lowe went on his post admin media round. To a man none of us would have done anything any different had we been in Lowe's position of trial by a kangaroo court. I hope MLT at least has the sense to make comment on where else he feels the club went wrong and who should be accountable.

 

kept NP...not relied solely on kids...the list is endless on how i would have done things different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you his official spokesman?

 

Dont be a pratt just be realistic and stop making moronic comments.

 

 

It is not completely Lowe's fault anybody with any sense I would have thought could see that.

 

He was not at the club when most of the financial damage was done

Edited by John B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont be a pratt just be realistic and stop making moronic comments.

 

 

It is not completely Lowe's fault anybody with any sense I would have thought could see that.

 

He was not at the club when most of the financial damage was done

 

When we had our income reduced from premiership levels to the ccc ones you mean....i think you will find he was...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lowe tell WGS that he wont buy the players he wants because he doesnt want to give money to our rivals.

Lowe thinks he knows best and appoints three managers (Wigley didnt even have the qualifications),and we are relegated.

Lowe brings in SCW and Simon Clifford,then builds an eye dome,instead of bringing in better players.

When Lowe eventually comes back with the help of the turncoat Wilde,he gets rid of a good manager and appoints a Dutch pair of jokers who look like they couldnt run Ikea.

We now face relegation yet again because of Lowe.

NOW TELL ME YOU LOVVIES HE DID A GOOD JOB!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lowe tell WGS that he wont buy the players he wants because he doesnt want to give money to our rivals.

Lowe thinks he knows best and appoints three managers (Wigley didnt even have the qualifications),and we are relegasted.

Lowe brings in SCW and Simon Clifford,then builds an eye dome,instead of bringing in better players.

When Lowe eventually comes back with the help of the turncoat Wilde,he gets rid of a good manager and appoints a Dutch pair of jokers who look like they couldnt run Ikea.

We now face relegation yet again because of Lowe.

NOW TELL ME YOU LOVVIES HE DID A GOOD JOB!

 

I suspect Numpty Canteeno will be writing a long defence AGAIN!! as we speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont be a pratt just be realistic and stop making moronic comments.

 

 

It is not completely Lowe's fault anybody with any sense I would have thought could see that.

 

He was not at the club when most of the financial damage was done

Please stop defending the indefensible. Lowe is a disgrace and I'm shocked that any so called Saints fan can defend him. Crouch and Wilde are equally as bad.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't see what difference a mea culpa it will make to our current predicament.

 

For the record this is what he said (various variations of this):

 

"Lowe believes the responsibility for Saints' predicament must be shared by all

at the club.

 

He added: 'Everybody who has been involved in the club, whether that's the board, everybody, has to bear a little bit of the blame.'"

 

Personally I think that is true, and I know I am in the minority, but why should one person accept the blame? He hasn't missed two penalties in a game for example.

 

Go on the link below, type in Rupert Lowe and listen to the interview he gave to SKY news which was almost identical to the others he was running with, and you'll get a very clear idea of where he believes the blame lies and certainly no evidence of him taking any share.

 

http://news.sky.com/skynews/video

 

In fact, I'll transcribe the key part here:

 

"So my primary blame is twofold, first of all, the bank, in my opinion overlent to the club and overlent to the board, and secondly the board that presided over that period (2006-2008 ) did not act wisely, it acted with folly"

 

The only time in the recent media circus was a small line (I think the one you mention) on one news report, but the main thrust of all his recent interviews was that the blame lies with the period between 2006-2008 and the bank and the board of that period were responsible.

 

That interview was probably the most high profile one he conducted and that certainly sets out his position very clearly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...