70's Mike

problem is the rot had set in, the principle of buying aquad rather than starters had been established and from point on ever decision was taken for shortterm financial gain rather than long term football gains.

i understand the principle but i just cannot see it working in any significant numbers

not sure if i understand are you say ruperts little gang did not want financial prudence ?

it is to do with the trades description act , we apparent tried to claim we had 4 defenders at Coventry

agreed the best two away days for years. But i also agree with Toomer something went wrong after Cardiff, i am not sure who was to blame but we wasted money on squad players without improving the quality of the starting 11.

Because the youngsters in question are almost certainly not as good as what we already have or else they would be attached to clubs and not having to pay mr hoddle

Why

so good football clubs are queing up for him ? sorry forgot Rupert knows best , hope sir alex is reading this

only when it suits ruperts army

Guy Askham

I was made redundant in March 2007 after 23 years with the same company, reason given was centralisation. As others have said , use it as an opportunity , i was out of work until November 2007 when i got a temp role , worked hard, and taken on as full time in June 2008. Only advantage i had was because i was un fairly selected for redundancy , i managed to negiaote a very big settlement package.

At 54 i am slowly falling out of love with the game. there are to many live games on telly and i can take it or leave it these days

Alan Ball , one and a half seasons saw Le Tiss at his best Chris Nichol also did a good job in really tough circumstances following Lawrie and Ted, believed in youth played them and exited the crowd

Big concern must be that Coventry will come to SMS without fear , attack us and put plenty of balls into the box. It is going to be a real test both physically and mentally

i think his name is David Wheater from Boro, but not sure if £3m would be enough

exactly some peoples memories only go back 18 months , normally the same people who think the club came into existence in 1997.

started in 2004 , nearly 5 long years ago in the history of this club

The only thing which effected the fan base was cr*p football

another lame duck

As i see it the problem is that clubs that introduce youngsters normally have 4/5 and they learn from expereienced players ( what ever the standard) We have opted to introduced 8/9 with only a couple of experienced players and they are not being taught during games, hence the same mistakes at Coventry as were made at QPR. They will not learn from their mistakes unless someone shows them.

and because football has lost any moral values it once had, someone will give him a job

Would agree if the same mistakes were not being made in every defeat , very little evidence that the errors of their ways are being pointed out to them or corrected

Sounds like poor management to me

another faceless unknown computer nerd , Red and White Army more like prawn sandwiches

are you rupert ?