Chez

or in other words "we care about the football club, but we care more about obtaining nottarfkrap".

Couldn't not wouldn't. Allen knows **** all. Luton Town lost 10 points for breaching regulations about paying agents from non club bank accounts, the question is have any FA regulations been breached by Jacobs et al? If they have then absolutely no reason why PFC2012 (or whatever guise they are going by this week) should be exempt from similar penalties. This is separate from failing to honour the first CVA and should be treated as such.

don't tell me, let me guess, the PST are honouring the first CVA? No? Then there is no chance of this. None. The way things are going its more likely they will lose additional points especially if one or two Luton fans question the FL as to what the difference is.

Hoillet looked pretty sharp the other day so that worries me too. I notice several 4-2-3-1 formations above. It needs to be a 4-4-1-1 like it was last week to protect these fullbacks.

Is it just me that can't get that only fools and horses episode out of their heads where del tries to invent the turban motorcycle helmet out of a horse riding hats?

It's a Lidl rather than an Aldi on Goldsmith Avenue. There is an ASDA half a mile away from **** park, a new Morrison's was built at the end of the M275 (close to the nearly refitted Sainsburys) and Waitrose has a store already in Southsea. Tesco is the only player without a large store on the island.

I am hoping the was one or two deals that were close to conclusion in the last window but just could.not be done for whatever reason otherwise no one is going to sign a three year deal with a relegation clause in it now. Need to shift some out. our wage bill must be big.

I know this statement is pointless but i will say it anyway. guly was good at west ham and has done a decent job when coming on in his preferred position of centre mid in the last few games.

Weston's posts seems logical to me whilst stuff like "Guly's contract says he MUST play for 15 minutes in every game" has been proven to be inaccurate. The other FACTs seem to be based on an Adkins quote saying he wanted one or two centre backs (he got one) giving rise to a conclusion that Adkins has no say in transfers. Oh and another Adkins quote saying all the teams must use the same formation to enable seamless transition. From that you conclude that Les Reed dictates the formation.

you'll need to type this at least 150 times me thinks before it sinks in to some.

There is no if. He does all those things apart from the transfers, which is based on a committee, which he is part of.

he played centre forward for them though so why have you not referenced Lambert and Rodrigez rather than Puncheon?

Everything I've seen suggests we have a real talent on our hands, but he's obviously down the pecking order. Hope he is settling in OK as not playing can't help that. He's still very young so I can see him becoming a huge fans favourite in years to come.

Not IMO. It was 4-4-2 (or if you prefer 4-4-1-1) with Ramirez playing off Lambert. Lallana and Puncheon played as left and right midfielders not wingers.

Mayuka is a striker not a right midfield. He can play as a winger as part of a 4-3-3, but I don't want to see him playing right midfield as part of a four.

Swansea did it themselves today, we caught them overplaying but didn't capitalise ourselves.

my party of three all felt this way.

you are right, we certainly need to beat teams like them to have a chance of staying up. Gutted at not getting the result but very pleased we have bounced back from the WBA debarcle. Can we kick on with a settled side and formation...

I thought the first was more a case of him running out of steam, his lack of pace meant he just made a desperate attempt to make up for it and he went down. Maybe not a dive just a going down easy. The second looked a huge dive. The third was too far from me but looked like a foul. The ref had a good game if you ask me apart from not playing advantage once. Clyne was lucky not to get a yellow before he did otherwise he would gone

yeah cos naturally he thought he'd wait for 11 games before doing that. You're struggling to convince yourself never mind anyone else.

Not sure Cork can be held responsible for the goal. Gazza made a poor choice simple as. It was the kind of mistake Kelvin has made in the past and been lambasted for.

for starters that was a long time ago, second I think you'll find we scored with two out of perhaps three chances and it was Mancu City that tore us apart. We didn't carve them open at all. If you had watched the Man City Swansea game you will have seen Swansea run Man City ragged. They were very very good in that game. My point is that they are not a bad side, but we made them look very very average today. We actually played well. If you don't think so then fine. It makes no difference and we'll have to beg to differ.

No Guly and no 4-3-3 means your interference theories have been blown apart. Stop digging.

er, it was at Man City. They murdered them and were robbed. I agree Fulham were poor and should have been beaten, but today it was about us nullifying them and not them being poor. Just look at how good they looked in the first ten minutes. We got hold of the game and didn't look back. We played well. We did create and at times they were hanging on. Maybe the clear cut chance weren't there, but we did enough to deserve to win. I get the feeling that because you have called for Adkins to be sacked you have drawn a line in the sand and now anything that happens is not good enough. I saw you moaned about the subs on another thread suggesting Adkins was clueless. He has made mistakes this season but not today.

I agree very little positive about the result, the performance was good though especially after the horror show at WBA. Can we follow it up with another and a win at QPR? If we do we might start dreaming...