CB Fry

A lecture from Alpine about cliché and stereotypes. Seriously, you couldn't make it up.

In other news, it's the sixth day of July.

All your contributions to this site are drivel. You think we are a tin pot club with no ambition. Fine. We get it. The rest of us will get on with supporting the club and team. After all they pi ss ed all over your doom laden drivel predictions last season, didn't they? The rest of us will settle in ready for your snivelling "well, it's all easy with hindsight" catchphrase when you roll that out in a few weeks or months time.

Chocolate is the answer, chubs.

The usual Alpine utter drivel.

Don't ever change, will you? FFS.

It took no effort at all to demonstrate how clever I am compared to you. But you are a fuc king moron after all.

Hmmm. I don't get any sense that TA is desperate to sign for Spurs (or more importantly desperate not to come back to us). Sign for us, give it a season and he's off to a Champions League club so everyone's a winner.

Saints could take legal action but if Toby might have played 50 games for Spurs by the time it gets resolved.

I'm guessing you read economic theory at Harvard, right? Apologies if I'm slightly out but there's a real sense of Ivy League thinking in your analysis.

You couldn't make it up, Littlejohn. I blame the EUSSR and the Guardianistas myself.

Wow. That's some pretty impressive economic analysis you've got going on there. Well done.

Arf.

Jesus wept.

Okay then.

Better paid workers = more disposable income = more profits = more jobs Easy this, ain't it?

Okay then.

You'll notice I am not having an argument with you. Because you're a fuc king moron.

Well we haven't bought him either, so we're as equally unprofessional then.

Weak.

Right. Your links were: 1. The link to the homepage of the faculty of English (their capitals, slavish followers) for Oxford University, so their entire website. 2. The home page of the Plain English (their capitals, slavish followers) campaign, so their entire website. Which parts of those entire websites will show me some of the "many" that think, like you, that the word "English" should not be capitalised. Point me in the direction of the "many".

Very quick look but every single mention of the word English is capitalised on both sites. So, this isn't going well is it?

What part of me referring to the body text in the blurb of the back cover did you not understand? Anyway, "many" you said and still nothing. Anytime you like point me the direction of just one of these "many" that go against the slavish followers like me and say the word English should not be capitalised. There's many so just one little, tiny reference to it must be there somewhere.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fowlers-Modern-English-Re-Revised-Edition/dp/0198610211#immersive-view_1436012927489 Here it is on Amazon with a handy image of the front and back cover, the blurb on the back clearly using "English" in the body text. Oh dear. Come on, "many" you said. Many. I only want one from you.

Find me a link to any one of these "many" people or sources who believe the word English should not be capitalised. I mean, there's "many" so it should be easy.