CB Fry

You quoted his post. It had his words in it.

1. If you thought that, you could have said it yesterday, but you didn't. How strange. 2. It's a better articulation of the pro-gun lobby than anything you've managed to come up with on here.

Season after. 2016 onwards.

Fair enough. ITK as often as not either full of it, have access to fragments, or utterly incapable of applying perspective to information they have (ie Crab Lungs gullible parroting of the whining of a pig sh it thick footballers temper tantrums).

When were we told there was no money to buy a striker?

Completely convinced thanks. No impact whatsoever. Shaw went to Manchester United. Lallana and Lambert went to Liverpool. Chambers went to Arsenal. You do understand the appeal of those clubs completely on their own terms, don't you? Hodgson's comments are irrelevant to everyone apart from forum hystericals.

You object to deed variation entirely and completely because it has some connection to the Milibands, giving you an nice convenient stick to beat them with. If Left wingers were attacking it you'd be defending it to the freaking death.

In fairness, when they took office unemployment was 1.4m at a rate of 5.3% and when they left office it had jumped to over two million and a rate of 7.2%. Pretty shocking stuff. Oh, hang on. That data is for between 1979 and 1997.

Four years away from the commemorative videos of our eighth place finish last season. Looking forward to seeing them.

LOL. Liverpool have slightly loftier ambitions than weakening the team that finished fully 28 points behind them the previous season. Batman has said why Liverpool signed him, and it is obvious why he wanted to go. None of it was "triggered" by anything Roy Hodgson said or didn't say.

Not that overdue, he was rightly nowhere near the squad last season.

Didn't seem that obvious to you earlier. Happy to help, though.

He moved to Liverpool because he wanted to play for Liverpool.

Everyone accepts our team that finished runners up in L1 was better than the then England team, so that argument has always rung true. It's a shame that Jack Cork is no longer good enough for England, though.

You're dumb enough to believe Pap thinks The Onion is real. Read his post again, literally all the words in it, and try and work out what the rest of us are actually laughing at.

You replace them with the mythical "next generation" of bright young kids to replace the "tired old guard" of, well, Daniel Sturridge and Danny Wellbeck. And then some sap (traditionally Alpine) chimes in with "let's chuck a lot of 19 year olds in and not even try to qualify for the next tournament, because that will mean we will then be in a great position to win the tournament after". The forum idiots guide to saving the national team.

I was hoping this thread was going to be about Hapeol Tel Aviv, Benfica and Ludogorets.

Rhyming couplets about Turkish are very welcome on this forum, but there is a particular thread you need to submit them to, you can't just post them anywhere.

I'd say he does.

It's highly likely that a majority Tory administration would have reduce tax in a different way.

Oh, I do apologise. I didn't realise you were talking about that completely different and unique policy. FFS.

Raising the tax free band to £10k was a LD policy whether you like it or not. Just a fact.

Today's a great day to celebrate the supremacy of the White man.

"I really have a problem with negroes and I just don't know why". #peoplesarmy

I'm with you. Whether our UKIP supporting idiot Lordship likes it or not, this is true. The LDs will get hammered on polling day because they were involved in coalition regardless of what they've actually done. In time history will judge them quite kindly for those policies you mention which were their initiatives after all.