CB Fry

How many people on here have said Clyne is "sh it"? Or anything remotely like that? Can't recall it myself. Or is this just being made up by resident forum tw ats perchance?

Let's stop this charade that any of you planks demand accuracy from Mark Lawrenson. You don't really care whether he is right or wrong. You just want him to predict Saints will win every single week. Please Lawro. Please say we'll win. Please. Please Lawro. Please. Please. Just say we'll win. Please. Please Lawro. Please. Please. Please.

This. The journey was far better than the destination.

And an even bigger div equates West Ham staying up with West Ham winning the league. Coooeee.

There was no sarcasm. Nice try though.

Of course it's a f ucking opinion. How the frig can someone saying we will or won't be challenging for fourth/sixth/whatever ever be "factual"? This is a webforum for opinions. Unfortunately littered with utter divs. Christ.

Wes Tender razor sharp as usual.

So you don't want us to qualify. Stop moaning if we don't win qualification matches then.

Why is Alpine getting so upset when he has already said he doesn't want us to qualify for Rio anyway?

If we get to a Wembley semi next season, I guarantee those currently sneeringly dimissing that acheivement as "only a lottery" will demonstrate a remarkable change of opinion.

What I have done is read the actual words in the piece. Not like the divs on here making up what they have decided it says and then grizzling about "accuracy". Total joke.

Chelsea don't have to sign Clyne for The Mirror to be right. Hell, they don't even need to bid for him for The Mirror to be right. On the story as printed, I would say the Mirror are more than likely correct. Mainly because the story came out of Chelsea or someone close.

I think you'll find that isn't "the project". Top half? That kind of lame-ass sh it is what pathetic clubs like West Brom go for. We're top six minimum, top four ideally. The project.

Clyne and Cork don't support Saints.

We'll have "no choice" when these players want to leave to better themselves. Funnily enough no one here wept any tears for Palace when we took Clyne from them, or when we outmuscled Burnley to land Cork. It's the football food chain.

Sorry. The forum has spoken. This story is, like, sooooo all completely made up by, like, lazy journalists and stuff. Excuse me while I now go into a hilarious routine on how journalists randomly link clubs and players off the top of their head. Oh yes, it's top drawer observational comedy.

The only lazy thing here is the traditional lazy forum response to newspaper story people don't want to read. Its fair to say you know nothing about what Chelsea want to do and this journalist knows far more than you will ever know.

So was Sir Stanley Matthews. Rickie is lucky to be a footballer now, and to live in a culture that massively over values the contribution a footballer makes vs other professions. He's hit the sweet spot of talent and demand. Nice work.

Lee Hoos has just been on BBC Breakfast News. True story.

Caborn is having a pop at the Olympics organising committee, in contrast to the divs on here grizzling about West Ham.

How about "These people were nothing more than employees of the club and they were paid for their work at the time"

You do get some breathtaking horsesh it on this forum. But this is spectacular. Merson the mind game puppet master. Luke Shaw the whey faced helpless lamb scared of leaving home. Keep em coming.

What differentiated the two was the simple fact that Le Tiss in his prime had a clear role for Saints where he was the focal point and the entire team was built around him. A role that he was never, ever going to get for England. And rightly so because Le Tiss simply not good enough to fo that role internationally. Frank Lampard, on the other hand, is a midfielder.

Boo hoo. Life's so unfair.

If he's anything, he's a "forward". Not a midfielder. So no "major error" there.