Jump to content

pimpin4rizeal

Members
  • Posts

    1,882
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pimpin4rizeal

  1. Would you be happy with him being our main striker then? he has done ok but nothing more, dodgy finisher and reliant on someone else to get the goals he won’t 20 m for us is record signing money so if we sold for that and used the 20m to get a delap or broja it’s a great piece of business their ceilings are far higher then his
  2. If our new striker isn’t better then che we are our in trouble, if we were to spend 20 m right now on a striker you would hope he is an improvement on che. so for that money might as well let him go and try to get a couple of decent ones like delap broja Dembélé
  3. I would sell che I think for 20 m hes a pretty average striker really his hold up play can be decent but not a great finisher and not great in the air..don’t think he would start for many prem sides.. for that money we can invest in the likes of broja delap Dembélé etc che is just average and will never be worth big money
  4. It’s almost like sports republic are messing with us and leaving the most important position (striker) until last :). also good news on that if we do get delap it’s perm now, thought this was likely and we don’t need the hassle of having to loan a new striker every year.. if we are going with kids we want to be the ones who benefit long term
  5. Exactly said this myself too in the transfer thread.. the buyback clause seems to be our way of doing things.. West Ham and Newcastle might be able to outbid us on a normal transfer fee, but will they give Chelsea the option to buy him back?? this is where our bid could be more appealing to Chelsea
  6. I’d be happy with either him or delap do prefer broja though as he just has. Electric pace for a big striker he’s got it all really. whatever we do I just hope it’s not loans, do we really want to disrupt our team every season and be looking to replace the loan ? I hope we learned from the broja loan last season that it’s not ideal plus I thought the point in going for kids was to also buy cheap and sell at a profit
  7. I really don’t get why everyone thinks delap would only be a loan? he’s in the same boat as Lavia and bazunu. Even if they didn’t sign haaland I doubt he would have seen much game time they would have probably played false 9 over him getting time.. now they have the hottest striker of the moment delap’s time will be extremely limited . see no reason we can’t get a similar deal with a buyback
  8. Chez as someone who has watched him a lot if you could compare him to another player? Who is he most like ?
  9. We can offer buybacks that the other clubs probably won’t though, which could make it a lot more enticing for Chelsea
  10. Just wondering if there could be a slight chance in us getting broja, if we are still interested I could see us going for a similarly structured buy back as to what we are doing with the bazunu Lavia deals, this could be more appealing to Chelsea then just selling to Newcastle or West Ham with no buy back ? to be honest I do think we might have moved on and delap looks the no brainer replacement but it would be great
  11. The only one I might actually stretch to using a loan is cole palmer as I don’t think city would actually sell him.. seems the most highly rated of the whole bunch.. mcatee could maybe still be available so wouldn’t surprise me if we even get him. im actually starting to find this approach quite exciting now stock piling a load of the greatest youth players we are bound to get some diamonds
  12. I really think we can get him on a perm.. he’s in the same position as Lavia and bazunu were really probably even less chance of him breaking through with haaland at city plus often they don’t really play a big cr anyway.. I actually hope we don’t go down the loans option again personally if we are devoloping these youngsters we want to be making profit from it too that should be the whole point in going for youngsters. broja was great and did help us last year but it’s frustrating that we were just putting him out of our price range by playing him
  13. Don’t see the need for a loan with delap, he’s not gonna be a first choice starter with city,, odd cup game at best really.. offer them a decent 15-20 m with a buyback at about 50-60 if he turns out totally world class they can have him back.. if not they got the 15-20 from us ?
  14. If we are really giving up on broja, I think Liam delap stands out a mile and we really should try and get this done, big powerful goal scorer looks a bit James Beattie like in a way 15-20m and a 50-60m buyback I can’t see why city would say no. Haaland totally blocks his pathway and they also signed alvaraz We should be all over this one
  15. Yeah it looks like we are starting from the back and adding at least one player in each position through the spine of the team.. it’s the strikers and number 10 we really need to get right though we need major surgery there
  16. Ralph made a comment like we didn’t have the money at the time.. maybe If we hadn’t signed AA we could of got broja on a perm? anyway very frustrating if he goes to West Ham we want to be getting the benefits out of these type of deals not just alerting other clubs
  17. Can we send them redmond ?
  18. I love the collar and cuffs on this it’s very reminiscent of the Patrick shirts in that way
  19. I think a move for Liam delap seems a no brainer, haaland coming in at city will totally kill his chances of breaking through and playing more then a couple of cup games.. I see no reason why we can’t get him with maybe a buyback inserted
  20. To quote my own post just wanted to add. That people think we play an attractive exciting brand of football is also a absolute myth.. don’t know what games you watching. Once broja is gone our current attacking options in the 10 positions and up front are verging on totally disgusting.. AA adams and long between them would struggle to finish a wank.. and then we have redmond eloyounoyssi walcott etc who offer zero creativity.. it’s scary how we can even get close to solving this problem atm Ralph has allowed this to happen on his watch..
  21. We have been absolute garbage for the whole backend of last season and the majority of this, barring a blip of form just after Xmas. His tactics are simply not working, we don’t look anywhere close to improving under Ralph’ I’d even say after how exciting both broja and livremento looked when they arrived both seem to be going massively backwards under his tutelage.. Can give all the excuses about our spending but we need someone in charge that can analyse our weaknesses know what needs doing and get the right personal or tactics to make it work. don’t see any of this happening at the moment, it looks like we are flogging a dead horse with this continued support of Ralph we look like relegation waiting to happen
  22. But these are players Ralph has chosen to keep and give a ton of game time too, he chose to keep long over the likes of gabbi.. redmond and bednarek have been firm favs of his.. this is his side
  23. Agree good post
  24. I don’t think we would have got relegated without him anyway so not sure about really gaining. And it is possible his presence in the team could have stopped the likes of tella or someone else stepping in.. overall though it’s frustrating to see such a top talent like broja just pass through and we make nothing financially.. Ralph did say at one stage we couldn’t afford broja at start of season.. but maybe we did our money on Armstrong instead ?
  25. Why? If they are getting haaland chances of delap breaking through for them is looking bleak. But I’d rather we concentrate on players that will benefit us in the long run, not raising the value of players for other clubs like we did with broja.. I thought the whole point of buying youngsters was for buy low sell high potential.. if it’s only a loan it doesn’t really give us any gain and then we are left with a hole to replace
×
×
  • Create New...