
suewhistle
Subscribed Users-
Posts
8,040 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by suewhistle
-
Thanks supersaint, I didn't realise. Now watching WH losing on a stream.!
-
Just got in from our club open day and barbecue where I was superb at table footie and 7 a-side (...), checked the OS and 'YES!'.. what a great day. No stress listening to DM, no stress reading the manic depresssives on here (only thro' quotes mind;-) ), and I can now go and digest the post match thread in a hazy wine and beered up but exercised and showered alcoholic haze... griiinnnn
-
Gawd, that almost has a ring of truth to it! Made me laugh anyway.
-
What?! Did HMRC drop the ball? [Wrong thread, mush;-) ]
-
To be honest, I was always a bit worried about this game. Pompey will now probably gently subside after giving it their all, and we can get back to non-derby football with the accent on the football and not the derby. Anyone know how Morgan is, as I think we missed him? Although I think Guly is a bit of a scapegoat for some he didn't do himself any favours. Lambert, as mentioned, is still not quite right, but hopefully a day vegging tomorrow will help. Fonte _will_ score against Palace, or maybe Jos.. Fox will recalibrate his dead-ball foot (please)..
-
that they actually pay, even if some of them are quite good.
-
Oh for goodness sake! if I said something like that you'd all say PMT, time of the month or similar juvenalia..
-
Either way, perhaps someone should tell alpine we're still ahead of WH, not behind. Apart from that, b******s! A bit more closing down in those areas, obviously, but talk about Lucky Strikes... Let's hope Lambert is firing on all cylinders on Monday.
-
I think we will score one from a cross from Richardson. Thought this thread needed a bit of positivity...
-
That was a good shot to equalise but a bit too much room. It's all a bit rushed and tense and I think we're being dragged down to their level. guly and lallana both good chances and even Lambert's free kick was a decent chance, Hoiveld has been close with a couple more. I don't think some of their players are too worried if they get an injury which means they have to return to their loaning clubs whereas Saints are trying to avoid being crippled for the run-in. Shame about Morgan as I thought he'd calm us down a bit but Cork has been playing well. The combination of fizzy beer, shouting and hyper-ventilation is building up towards some classic burps later on!
-
When they come out that tunnel!!! Any doubts will be dispelled...
-
The "I'm not watching or listening to the game" thread
suewhistle replied to SO16_Saint's topic in The Saints
It's far worse listening to rambling 'what we don't want to do' Dave, or following the match thread, 'yes' '****', and the like. At least at the ground you can see things developing and scream your head off. I think there should be a few streams today, so I shall compromise by screaming my head off at home.. -
or sister :-)
-
A few potential replies: 4-1, administrations You've never paid eff all
-
I'm surprised there hasn't been more semantic discussion and dissection over the "I think". ;-)
-
No idea who she is, and as a couple of the posters on here are on my ignore list this thread makes even less sense. I shall go back to my bottle of Primitivo.
-
As a teacher I would consider violence against a pupil a bit of a failure, but I reserve the right to defend myself. You wouldn't do, even to an immature child, what you wouldn't do to an adult. If you did anything to an adult it would be costrued as an assault, so why should it be permitted to a child? The only time I've made physical contact with a child was during a summer school with a French group where, during the crowded end of course disco I found a kid crouched down trying to set light to a varnished gym bench.I didn't make full contact with his head to stop him: more like a gentle stroke across his head, but in the circumstances I'd do it again. An adult I'd probably have made full contact....
-
I believe that may be Daddy's name... It's a family business.
-
Yes, I think you've essentially got it..
-
Blue Square, you'll soon be in the Blue Square, You'll soon be in the Blue Square, etc...
-
How about "the lost seats due to pompey not filling their allocation", plus the ones without coach tickets, of course....
-
Now you're just being silly...
-
It was outside a court...
-
Halo, you crafty b****r!
-
So even if he did loan them _some_ money that may not be a "Consideration"? What would be needed for it to be so considered? Clapham et al have been remarkably quiet....