aintforever

Do you have a legal right to Bangladeshi citizenship? I don’t, and I doubt Nick Griffin does.

Great results, lifts a bit of pressure off us for Sunday now.

We can’t leave her stateless anyway you penis, the decision will get overturned in the courts if that’s the case (which it probably will). Nick Griffin! You tool.

The security services are already overstretched, don’t see the point in adding to their problems when we can just leave her to rot in Syria. This is someone who clearly still supports the ISIS cause, obviously has terrorist contacts and has been exposed to a war zone for years.

We’ve revoked citizenship before and we’ll do it again, so yes we can ban people from coming back. I agree that in principle it’s probably not the correct thing to do but given the threat these jihadis pose and the state of our police, I’d prefer to have her in a tent in Syria than on the streets over here.

All well and good but if we just open the door and let all the Jihadis back, and a few months down the line pop concerts and tube trains are getting blown up, people will rightly ask why didn’t our government do all they can to keep them out.

Interesting thread

No one, except the odd loon, is going to not buy a car because they mentioned Brexit, hundreds of companies with products to sell have spoken out against it, even Nissan mentioned it in their descision. Their descision was explained very clearly on radio 5 yesterday. Because of the shift from diesel to electric/hybrid there requires massive investment and it made sense to invest in fewer locations so Swindon was going to close regardless of wether we were in the EU or not.

Exactly my point, They have said it is due to Brexit, no need to say something anodyne.

If that was the case why didn't Nissan just say so?

I’d be surprised if he didn’t want a striker.

Agree in a way but there needs to be a deterrent to stop other scumbags going abroad and doing the same so think it’s the right thing to do.

Well the EU worked wonders for the people of Swindon there then.

This. FPTP has had it's day.

Nope, I hope the government stick to their word and do all they can to block her from coming back. It's naive to think she didn't know what she was doing when she went out, she only wants to come back because the Yanks are kicking IS' ass. In theory she is our problem but hopefully the Peshmerga would have other plans for her.

C https://www.givemesport.com/1453518-the-premier-league-table-based-on-net-spend-over-the-past-five-seasons

I never said they were the same, just laughing at the idea that we’re one big football family.

Easy to see why we are where we are.

Hopefully. Problem is the FPTP system means it's unlikely to happen because either side are too scared about letting the other one in. Something is seriously wrong when the only choice is May or Corbyn. Watching parliament try and get Brexit sorted out has just been painful. The country badly needs proportional representation but that wont happen. You would imagine under PR the ERG and Corbyn nutters would have their own fringe parties with two reasonably sensible main parties making the actual decisions.

Maybe your Brexit voting buddy with the boat will sack himself?

Football family, that's laugh. Cardiff's idea of all coming together on Saturday was "England is full of sh!t" "England f*cked it up", "You're just a small town in Portsmouth", "You're going down with the Fulham". Then they were mortally offended by a couple of blokes doing airplane impressions.

No I didn't, I was leaning towards leave but didn't vote because it wasn't clear what I would be voting for. My point was that our government went to Europe to try and get a temporary brake on the amount of immigration and it was told to get lost, had the EU shown bit more flexibility we wouldn't be in this mess. The benefits capability is not going to effect the influx of cheap labour which causes wage depression. As I have said before I don’t have a huge problem with being in the EU, I just accept there has to be the free-movement thing. If Poland were experiencing mass immigration and their people were unhappy with it’s effects who are we to say you must let us in to get the benefits from living in their country? The sensible and right thing to do would be to listen to and act on the concerns of their population. Immigration has been an issue for a lot of people at the last few general elections, whenever the subject was brought up the left branded them racists and the right blamed the EU. The referendum finally gave people the chance to actually do something about it. Laughably, there was some EU guy on the TV the other day saying they couldn’t let the UK have controls on immigration because every country would want them. Democracy at it’s finest - can’t give people what they want! Oh, and please don't quote dumb or dumber as I have these two scumbags on ignore.

Yeah I was aware of that.

It’s scaremongering to suggest that it’s being planned or will happen in the near future because it obviously isn’t going happen. But to say it’s the direction we are heading, all be it to an extreme and unlikely outcome, could be considered fair considering how much the EU has changed. There just seems to be an usnstoppable inertia towards the EU getting more and more power. I’m not a nationalist, I just don’t like what the EU has become. It should be every country’s right to control who goes in or out, the idea of fee-movement is fine but if country’s are experiencing mass net immigration they should be given the option of some sort of controls. When Cameron was told to get lost when he tried to get a temporary brake it showed how little control we have about what is decided in Brussels and how democratic it is.

Oh come on, the direction of travel is pretty clear when you look at what the EU started off as and what it is today.