aintforever

That's where you are wrong. This guy decapitated a man he had run over in a car, it was a cowardly act. He didn't try and take Rigby on in a straight fight because he knew a UK serviceman would more than likely win. He is a coward and is probably lying in bed sh!ting himself knowing that a couple of screws can come in at any moment and **** him over again. It doesn't matter what your state of mind is, no one likes having their teeth knocked out - this is a good thing.

You might be right about their attitude to violence but nobody would enjoy having their teeth knocked out. Has to be good news IMO.

Not at all, if I filmed myself at work calling my company's clients scum and posted it on the internet I would be sacked.

Expensive cold war relic, the money would be much better spent providing us with energy security than deterring some threat that doesn't even exist. Of course it provides that extra bit of security from potential overseas threats but I think getting rid would be worth the risk, especially given that we are skint and there are other risks to our safety. Energy, the environment and the potential collapse of our monetary system are all more potent risks IMO. There are plenty of countries around the world that don't need nukes, the best deterrent there is is to stop interfering in other countries issues.

Most important is: 1. A top quality striker (we were VERY lucky last season that Lambert didn't get inured) 2. Cover/competition for Shaw 3. Cover/competition for Clyne 4. Pacy wide/attacking player I'm happy with the CB and GK options but it obviously depends what the club's ambitions are and how far they are willing to go to make it realistic.

Would be a superb signing but wont happen, seems to be part of Jose's plans.

It's easy to sell season tickets if you price them cheap enough. Fact is their pricing policy is all about appeasing the hardcore when it should have been aimed at maximising revenue. Maybe they need the cash upfront so have little choice but handing out free games will come at a cost. Their hardcore is probably about 7000 so they would have paid whatever for a ST. 6 games free at say £20 a ticket and they are already chucking away £840,000. Still as long as the mongs are happy, that's all that matters... ..for now

I agree that Labour are not much different from the tories but that's why, with a half decent leader, they would have walked the next election. They spend most of their time pretending they're something they're not but that's all the tories do. Ed Milliband is unelectable. He comes across as a bit simple and can't even speak properly. The fact that the party elected him as their leader (thanks to the unions) is reason enough for the British public to not trust them with running the country.

Of course he is, that's why all these players come from the four corners of the globe to play in the Premier League.

I'm not taking it seriously, quite the opposite. I will just be laughing my nuts off if the skate c*nt loses his job.

What a load of b@ll@x. Try and scare the sh!t out of you saying you are going to lose loads of money, and the solution - spend £89.95 on a subscription to a sh!t magazine!

I think it's quite sweet how they say they hate us so much but will still happily do our manual labour. Wouldn't be surprised if that company's contract ends up in the dustbin sometime next week.

Does seem strange. I expect the Tories have mates in the city who will make a fortune from it (meaning they will as well) plus the government get a wedge of cash to make their figures look good in the short term.

Chelsea City United Sunderland Stoke Palace Saints: 8th

Could quickly revert back after the first few games.

The whole "we've already voted in 1974" argument is laughable, the Europe some, now very old, people voted for back then is nothing like the Europe we a saddled with today. When you see MPs come out with that argument they just look embarrassed. Why don't people just admit that the reason they don't want a referendum is because we would vote to get out?

No, but some on here seemed to think he was on some sort of protracted 9 month fitness regime.

What's the difference between locking someone up for life without review and locking someone up for life with a review that is automatically going to be turned down? Brady might have his review and say he's really sorry and promises not to do it again. Why won't you let him out like you would other serial killers?

He might be a great player I don't know enough about him to judge. My only concern is that the Scottish league is garbage, Neil McCann looked good at that level. As for the CL, buying a player on the back of a handful of games at any level is a bit of a gamble. I'm not moaning but we did spend alot last season on average players, hope they get it right this time.

I don't think they are, plenty of people have been released to offend again. Anyway the chance of parole would give them hope, they need to know they will die inside to be punished properly.

Not sure about spending £12.5mill on some one from the Scottish league, bit of a gamble.

I'm not saying give up all our human rights, just don't sign up to that specific agreement. The UK is more than capable of writing it's own. We live in England, you can't fart without effecting someones human rights. Why do people think we are suddenly going to turn into Stalinist Russia by making slight changes to laws concerning mass murderers?

Not really, if we are never going to let them out we don't need to worry about their rehabilitation. I think whole life sentences are appropriate because they completely remove the criminal's hope, that's part of their punishment. It's time to just pull out of the European Court of Human Rights.

Wouldn't make any difference really as actual crime always has been higher than reported crime. Crime is and will continue to go down because of technology. Things like CCTV, mobile phones, forensic science and the internet make solving crime much easier than years ago.

The percentage of immigrants or ethnic minorities in inner city areas would be higher so wouldn't reflect the national average.