aintforever

So that's the end of this thread then. The cheats have got away with it scot free. Sends a clear message to every club in the Championship - you might as well gamble on promotion and get your self 100million pound in debt - the very worst that could happen is you end up back where you were.

I think that's more to do with us being ****.

I don't have a problem with what Rooney earns, there's shed loads of money in football today, it's only right the players get the lion's share. I think Man Utd have made a mistake giving him so much though, I think he's already peaked. He's only 24 and he's got the body mass index of a pot bellied pig, god knws what he will look like when he gets past 25 and fills out.

They wont go bust, they are just trying to get away with not paying Gaydamak so they can go on another spending spree. Cheating ****s.

I don't buy that, the Chanrai sueing Gaydamak thing happened before Chanrai got involved in PFC. Why would Chanrai get involved with or put himself in a situation where he can be shafted by Gaydamak again? It doesn't make sense. Gaydamak and Chanrai are working together IMO.

I don't buy that, the Chanrai sueing Gaydamak thing happened before Chanrai got involved in PFC. Why would Chanrai get involved with or put himself in a situation where he can be shafted by Gaydamak again? It doesn't make sense. Gaydamak and Chanrai are working together IMO.

There's also the possibility that Gaydamak and Chanrai are both in this together for the same end and all this "Gaydamak's demands" stuff is just a convenient way of blaming the closure on someone a thousand miles away. I don't buy the way Chanrai 'accidently' ended up owning the club for one minute.

There's also the possibility that Gaydamak and Chanrai are both in this together for the same end and all this "Gaydamak's demands" stuff is just a convenient way of blaming the closure on someone a thousand miles away. I don't buy the way Chanrai 'accidently' ended up owning the club for one minute.

Won't happen, it's just threats to make Gaydamack to lower his demands - he will get nothing if it folds.

could my toast finally be ready?!

I tried watching Saints sober once before - not a good idea.

The is a shining example of how Labour let the country down and why the Tories are in power. When scum like this milk the system it's the hard working lower paid people (supposedly Labour's people) that are let down more than anyone. Hopefully Cameron will keep the cuts in benefits going.

Never been, but I'm guessing it's better than Weybridge.

If we're not counting Le Tiss, I would go for Bergkamp, there was a game at Highbury where he destroyed us. Other than him, Gullit, Henry, Zola, Gazza or Wright.

To be fair, 1170 might not seem alot of fans to us but for a club the size of Portsmouth it's quite good going. Well done.

It's not a big deal, Huddersfield is a tough place to go, we can easily go up without winning every single game. I'm just getting deja-vu from last season, if we have the old "have to learn how to play on these boggy pitches" 'have to be more physical/direct" ect again I'm gonna shoot myself. The players and manager should know how to get results in this league, neither should be learning lessons at this stage.

It's not a bad thing, just frustrating that we are struggling in he bottom half of League 1 when players who can't even get a regular spot on our bench walk into a team at a higher level. If Mills performs well at Championship level questions should be asked.

There is still a fair chance of getting automatic, there is still tons of points to play for. I would be more confident if our manager wasn't talking about "learning lessons" like he did after Saturday. I thought he knew this league back to front, going to Huddersfield shouldn't be a lesson in anything.

Looks like a complete disaster, the aircraft carriers would probably have been white elephants anyway but without aircraft what is the point? The current government are in a no win situation - you can only blame labour for signing the contracts. We should cut and run from Afganistan though, I don't see the point in spending millions on that war when we can't even afford a proper navy - complete madness.

Surely if there is a settlement that rules out gross misconduct.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1207172/Sulaiman-Al-Fahim-insists-Portsmouth-takeover-track--ambassador-Diego-Maradona-100m-spend.html

I see they are playing the same game again "we have to have it our way or the club gets liquidated and everyone loses out" Whilst that worked in the Prem, I don't think that will wash at all with the Football League.

Guly definitely earned his place, plus if it doesn't work out Barnard would be a better impact sub - he looked fighting fit last week.

And it's only £20 a ticket. They always said we got higher attendances because we practically gave tickets away. They really do have poor support.

I disagree, I would say the players put more work in against Plymouth than they did against Tranmere. I think pro footballers generally try as hard as they can, I would put it more down to organisation and everyone knowing what their job in the team is. Better fitness and tactics also help.