aintforever

That's the whole point though, if it's not democratic it is a complete and utter farce. As long as the club hand pick the candidates it will never be a voice of the fans so any decisions made will be meaningless, just a bunch of Lowe luvies sat around giving the "fans" approval on whatever disaster lowe has lined up next. The only way it could possibly work is if the club had no say at all in who the fans choose to speak for them - why should the club pick and choose?

We're ****ed

Hopefully he is being shipped out to raise cash for a loanie. Made no sense having him and Forecast sat there scratching their asses - yet more very poor management.

If it's democratic it's democratic. That means if the fans want 4 Chorley's to represent them then so be it. If people are not allowed on because certain people perceive them as "hot heads" or "loud mouths" then the whole process is a complete farce.

My nomination has to go to Richard Chorley, if only to expose this pathetic attempt at PR for what it is.

I support the club and that includes everyone, not just the first team. By buying into Lowe's experiments you are actually being unsupportive to the team in the long term IMO.

I wont be renewing if Lowe or Wilde are still running the club regardless of what league we are in. I'm not too bothered about watching crap football. I refuse to help finance any more of Lowe's experiments, I think those who renew will actually be helping the demise of the club. The only way forward for SFC is to force these idiots out, admin or not IMO.

Lowe has to take all the blame IMO, sacking Pearson and putting Pootvleit in charge was a mistake of Steve Wigley proportions.

Think we are going to need 6 points from our next to games to stand any chance, can't see us geting much from Watford or Wolves away.

You are ignoring the fact that if Lowe had offered Pearson ANYTHING then he would have announced as such to avoid the inevitable bad PR. It is crystal clear what happened, Lowe had his own guys lined up before the season even ended. Pearson was sacked because he wasn't Lowe's man and we are going to be in League 1 next season as a direct result.

It does illustrate the point that Lowe's excuse for sacking Pearson is complete ******. Managers wages are always pretty insignificant in comparison to all the other costs.

I do think this diamond formation works better when teams come at us, so there is that hope. Having must win games away from home is never a good thing though.

5 away out of the last 8 - we are ****ed.

To be fair when Billy Davis took over Forest were below us, now they are not.

I'm trying to get my head round why Lowe/Wilde want to set up a Fan's Parliament NOW? Is it just a way of trying to appear fan friendly so that more people buy season tickets (it has coincided with cheap ticket offers) or do they genuinely not understand why the fans hate their guts and want feedback? I dont get it, we are a handfull of poor results away from going out of business and NOW they want to set up a Parlament,

Wotte's role was always Academy Director, but I wouldn't read too much into his job title. Remember Woodward was Director of Football and never did anything except blow thousands of pounds on eye gyms and fish tanks. I expect Wotte had a pretty big say behind the scenes, it wouldn't surprise me if he had more say than Jan over personnel. I know he had links to Saeijs and he was brought in under Poortvleit, plus Dean Gorre apears to be his guy and so was he.

If it's so unsafe to stand surely we should all have to crawl to our seats? You really must be thick if you think it's unsafe to stand and watch a game of football at SMS.

I would say get rid, would prefer a manager with experience of that league.

He might show a bit of potential but in our current situation he has been a complete waste of money. We were not in the position to speculate a few quid on untried French kids this season.

As the deadline for taking the points hit this season is Thursday the 26th it wouldn't make any sense to announce it this week. My guess would be that the bank have given us some leeway to help us stay up, they will only put us in admin if we are obviously down after the Blackpool game. Whilst there is still a chance of staying up it makes no sense for the bank to push for admin. If we go down there is little chance of them getting their overdraft paid off.

I think it would be unavoidable, we are losing money in this league I don't see how we could surviive on a fraction of the gate receipts, TV money etc. The mortgage will cripple us IMO. I think the cost of the repayments are the equivilent to the income from having 6000 at £20 a head for every home game. We will probably see gates of around 8-10,000 under Lowe in league 1.

Doing a Luton could be a frightening reality if we dont get new ownership if we go down. If Lowe is still making the descisions after our 10 point deduction in League 1 I would put money on a relegation again.

We're always skint regardless of the financial climate.