I have no problem with the principle, but it's just going to be the case of using this method for the first time and building confidence in it. There is something quite reassuring about holding a specific ticket in your hand.
Wish we had taken the last round a bit more seriously. Palace beat us a few years ago then defeated Man Utd, Sunderland beat Chelsea.... It must be a great omen to get Saints in the final 16.
As everyone got a point, then it's all kinda meaningless really. Just keeps the gaps the same but on a higher number.
I would take that as a -1 point for Pap. So his total is.... -1.
Also, i've miss-counted!
Smirking, through what appears to be a completely unbiased and un-tampered voting process.... you have 7 points and a clear bronze medal.
I shall be content with 4th.
And Turkish is the LVP.... Barry Sanchez must be seething.
http://help.surveymonkey.com/articles/en_US/kb/What-happens-if-I-reach-100-responses-with-a-BASIC-account
Judging from this you can work from the first 100 responses, it just won't show you the ones after, so to all extents and purposes, voting is closed.
Only the second time that variation has been used. I'm impressed!
Can you not declare the results based on the results as they stood at 100 Bear? (100 people voted....!?)