pingpong

That's because hadrian was publicly queer, and he built a famous wall. The two aren't linked, the gay history part is all about hadrian. And he built a famous wall. It's only gb news and the mail that have projected the queer history part on the wall and not on hadrian.

If you thought the exact opposite, you could have posted the same article. It's not clear if places are overdiagnosing or underdiagnosing...

He was on. I don't have the tech skills to add a screenshot but at 20secs in you can pause it, and if you look at pitch pattern, you can see he is further back into the dark green than their left back.

Smallbone made a driving run that gave brooks the space to shoot, as well as supplying the cross for Adams goal. He was a key figure, far from peripheral, and helped get the crowd going too. He's a crisp passer of the ball. He also really wants to play for us. We should support him when he plays. I'd be happy with him or aribo playing, it's nice to have two in form players for that position.

Think that's harsh, you are missing the silent majority. I reckon about 35%, maximum.

Sunak has just given a speech that is the very definition of woke, welcoming diversity and celebrating multiculturalism and anti-racism. Not sure how that will sit with some of his backbench. Is he trying to force them over to reform?

Smallbone has 87%pass completion rate Aribo has 85% pass completion rate

A few diversity and woke initiatives and edi officers could have saved 52m for our local council... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-68433863.amp

If we can beat Liverpool, forest can beat man utd. If we go through, it could easily be forest away.

Should be an easy win against klopps kids, they will certainly be underdogs, and surely couldn't get two surprise wins in a row, if we don't win we will be bottlejobs.

I think he was subbed on, not off, after rabiot got injured in the first half.

Chelsea current players on the pitch have an average age of 22.9, but that doesn't fit the narrative...

Think we've got a good chance against these "young Liverpool pups who are defying the odds" right now by even being on the same pitch as chelsea, who themselves will be devastated if they miss this easy chance to win a cup. Plucky plucky Liverpool... average age of 24 you know.

So, now that islamists are in charge(source; braverman), what changes do we expect to see? Im guessing, similar to when the taliban took control in Afghanistan, that one of the first things will be the restriction of education for girls and women. Do we know if there is a bill coming yet on that? How quickly can we expect it, because my daughter is still going to school at the moment and I want to know if I should take her out now? Also, now that the islamists are in charge, shouldn't we be changing the prime minister? And what is the impact of this on the monarchy? (Or on parliamentary procedure?) Also, why is this not bigger news? Usually when a new group takes charge of the government it is front page news, I can't even find it on the BBC homepage. Is this the start of mass censorship?

He wasn't making himself bigger or taking up an unnatural position, his arms were down. Never a pen in a million games, under the current rules.

We already know that 52% of the population falls under that category, more than enough to engineer another 4 yrs.

I'd expect 13 points for us from those, maybe 11 if things goes badly, can't imagine losing to any of those. For Leeds, I'd predict 7 or 9 it's. Which leaves us looking pretty tidy if all goes as you'd expect.

There would have been no complaints on the first goal if he had not even dived for it. If he had been a bit slower, or stood flatfooted, people would have just accepted he had no chance, he was blindsided by the defender in front and saw it late. Also a good finish. If the positions were reversed, and it was brooks scoring that, everyone would just be saying it was a quality finish, not a single person would blame the keeper.

Excruciatingly, it seems they've all been instructed not to use pronouns for brianna and use her name only, and it's leading to some very odd sentences and slip ups 🤔

Turns out it was starmers fault. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68237826 And he's stopped using Brianna's pronouns now, preferring to just make nonsensical sentences instead. Hard to know which depths they will go to next, the dearth of quality in the conservative party right now is astonishing.

If we're going to take this to its natural conclusion, we have to question why sunak used she/her pronouns for Brianna Ghey. If he is going to poke fun at those who acknowledge transwomen exist, he should also have referred to Brianna using he/him pronouns. Or does he also 'not know what a woman is'?

Times like this I miss ceefax.

Polo innit.

The woke left hold all the power in this country. These days, if you say you're english you get arrested and thrown in jail, yet this guy gets a 4 star hotel.

I wonder of any of the people who moan about a hundred genders etc have actually ever looked up a list? The daily mail etc only get to their mocking numbers by being nitpicky. For example, here are a few, which count as 10 genders according to the antiwoke, but are basically just different nuances of the same thing: Trans-man Transgender man Transgender male Assigned female at birth (afab) Female to male (f2m) Masculine presenting Trans masculine Transsexual man Transsexual male Transgender person So there may be many descriptions, but they all basically fall into the following 4 categories: male, female, transgender, gender non-conforming and those who worry about the alphabet mafia, most of the population just uses lgbt+ nowadays. Live and let live...