Jump to content

Saint_clark

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    35,164
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Saint_clark

  1. I think it's pretty much a given that when we get back to the Prem ticket prices will be around the £40 mark. And all those things you listed are very extreme - we haven't seen anything like that so far.
  2. Wasn't it you that suggested we don't play as well on the weekend when we don't have a midweek game? Apologies if not.
  3. Bumping this post because it's gone ignored and could possibly be the most important piece of info on this thread.
  4. Well, just as you don't see why Benali would make something like that up, I don't see why the club would lie and said that there were no legal proceedings happening.
  5. Maybe he WAS planning legal action, but decided against it. Or there was an out of court settlement.
  6. Except that according to SFC there won't even be a day in court. Who to believe, huh?
  7. Check out the latest comment on the video I made a while ago
  8. The old Charlotte Church says yes.
  9. It's also worth noting that it was DSM who banned you Guided Missile, and I don't think he even visits this site anymore.
  10. As I said, I didn't mean to cause offence. I've tried in the past to change my tone so that I didn't swear etc, and I was called a "pious tw*t" for doing so. Given that, I just talk as naturally as I can.
  11. GM, I apologise if you took my post as an attempt to insult you - I just find the idea that we are being told what to allow by the club completely laughable. And having checked back, the point about Benali wasn't the only potentially libellous part of the thread you were banned for starting.
  12. After clarification from GM i'll let this thread run.
  13. Maybe not, considering our away form is better than our home.
  14. I actually did agree with that idea (although I think having sub-forums in the lounge would work better), but only Steve and Baj can mess about with that kinda stuff. Until they see that thread there's nothing to be done really.
  15. That was actually suggested by users, if you remember back to when we left TSF and this place started up.
  16. Yep. http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?28376-Game-off
  17. This place was bland long before I was made a mod - and there are many posts/threads that i've left running that would have been shut by the previous ones. Deppo could have probably been banned 5 times over from what i've seen, but his posts can actually be quite funny. It's the people who report the "trolling" posts that make this place bland. They need to learn the difference between banter and just trying to be annoying.
  18. No-one was "sh*tting themselves". Steve just didn't want this place involved in what would be seen as a petty dig at the club. You're adding 2 and 2 and getting the moon landing conspiracy.
  19. I never said that. I said that the club has no say at all in the running of this forum. The link Steve described and what Stu is suggesting on TUI are two completely different things.
  20. Again, rubbish. If this were true then the mods would have been given instructions to clamp down on people slagging off the club, and we've been given nothing of the sort. Besides you will find plenty of threads, if you head back through the main board, criticising the club and being left open. I know Stu believes that SFC is running this forum, or we have a club PR man overseeing everything or some bullsh*t, but it's simply not true. The agreement for use of pictures and the club crest outside of copyright was from before Liebherr took over anyway. I've already paid. What point are you trying to make? Ah right, fair enough.
  21. In all fairness a football forum means f*ck all - until you start charging people to use it.
  22. Well I don't think our palms would come into contact with our face as much, for starters.
  23. No, basically. As for those who criticise the regime being banned - absolute rubbish. Hypo, Docker-p, CB Fry* have all had plenty to say against the club, and they're all still here. If you're thinking of Stu then he was banned for breaking the rules of the forum, simple as that. *there are plenty more, I just can't be bothered to think of them by now. Hypo came up with a nice little list on another forum yesterday.
  24. If only we had right footed Ashley Cole our defence would look very good tbh. Dawson and Terry in front of Hart, Cole on the left...Johnson is the only weak link. Personally I think Richards should be given more of a chance, he looked quality when he first came into the set up.
  25. Ah right, misread your post - apologies. I thought you were insinuating that this forum and the club were somehow in the wrong for having an agreement in place.
×
×
  • Create New...