Wurzel

The way their finances work it could well be half a million at the time of writing but £2million by the time of reading

From the Official Pompey Twitter Can't imagine what the problem can be ....

Really? Sounds like you're just the person I'm looking for then. 30p an hour, but hey it'll be fun working here £15k would provide me with anything I need £150k would provide me with anything I could ever want £1.5m would provide me with anything I could ever dream of. it would sure as hell make a difference to my self worth and motivation. And like the football analogies above, the best companies want the best men/women for the job, to get them they have to outbid the others. I do agree that some of the huge bonuses paid out recently have been excessive but not in the LloydsTSB case as referred in the OP. None of us know what the targets for the year were, it could well be that despite the big loss (majority of which is from past actions) is much smaller than expected thanks to a good management performance. But please please please don't pay my £5. I can scrape it together myself, non-payment is a deliberate ploy to stop me getting into time consuming discussions like this

Of course there is.Would your lifestyle change if your income halved ? If someone has been earning, say, £300k for the last 5 years they are going to have a lifestyle and commitments that require that amount. It may be a mortgage on a house the likes of you or I could never dream of, or loans for unnecessarily flash cars or holiday homes abroad or big pension payments but then that is the rewards of their status. To say it would have little difference on their life is ridiculous. (and that's my 3 for the day so i can't combat your inevitable rebuttal)

Joking aside that's the main reason you need their permission. They can't make someone else (i.e the tenant) homeless because of your debt, they would need them to sign some sort of disclaimer (can't remember the technical term) so that if necessary they can do. If they want £90pcm just add that to the rent figure you had in mind. Most potential landlords underestimate what people are willing to pay rent-wise.

They don't get a cut do they? Think it's only cup games H&A share the receipts, league matches it all goes to home club.

Don't know if I'm alone but for me the Pompey rivalry is now just a minor detail in this saga. It's better than any soap on tv, with new twists and turns every day. Company law, financial rules, football regulations, evil foreigners, courtroom drama, political interventions, celebrity endorsements (well Matt Slater ), regular characters, cameo appearances, comedy, sympathy, even genuine sadness at times (ok those bits are few and far between) It's even got product placement (Barbie dolls and mobility scooters) I think I'd be following it on a daily basis even if it was about Rangers, Plymouth or anyone else come to that. And like any good mystery story nobody can be quite sure how it's going to end. Gonna miss it when it does though.

But did they walk or were they pushed ?

http://oxygen.mintel.com/sinatra/oxygen/display/id=68209 Just saying

From twitter a few days ago Hit and hope? If he did come back at least he'd benefit from warming a bench that was closer to home

Court to appoint administrator though. Probably worst outcome they could have

Seconded. Perhaps once this thread has come to it's logical conclusion we can start a new one giving the likes of Mero all the support we can in getting a Phoenix club up and running. After all it's in our own interests to have a club that we can bicker with, insult, take the ****, even come to blows with occasionally. Without one our wives and girlfriends are going to be the ones to suffer. But joking aside, the town has enough sensible fans to deserve a replacement club to get behind, albeit in a much lower league to start with (only fair on the rest of the league). Apart from that we need someone to gloat over as we continue our march to the CL, B'mouth will never be enough

Middlesbrough done that once for an away game at Blackburn. Got docked 3 points. Was the difference between them going down and us staying up. Oh the irony

This morning Chris Evans dedicated his Radio 2 Breakfast Show to today being National Toast Day. Just saying

As usual you ignore the whole point in favour of a cheap shot . Do you really think, just as one example, we played McGoldrick all season when we had established international Gregorz Rasiak on our books because he was the better player. Course not, we found ourselves in a position where we couldn't pay GR's wages so we loaned him out and played an inferior player instead. Didn't grizzle about it. Didn't stomp our feet, throw our toys and whinge about level playing fields. We just did what was right. How many of your high earners that you can't afford have you loaned out?

I meant on future deals from a set date, clearly it would be wrong to change the terms of existing deals retrospectively. I guess you're right though, simply doing away with the football creditors rule would mean no rule would be needed that transfers must be paid up front. It would be up to the selling club if they were prepared to take that risk of receiving installments. Paying up front would probably become self fulfilling in a few years anyway - after all if someone had done due-diligence on Pompey 6 months ago what would they have seen? Probably enough to think they were good for the money. Word soon gets round, and once bitten twice shy, any club letting another club down would find it very hard buying players in future.

The whole football creditors rule should be so easy to overcome. 2 new football rules are all that's needed 1) Transfer fees must be payed in full, in one installment, before a player's registration at a new club becomes effective. 2) No club can select a player for a match who's salary is more than 31 days in arrears (in accordance with the terms of his contract) Might start seeing some sanity in the transfer / wages market then. Football debts could then be treated the same as every other debt because effectively there should never be any.

No we just had the one -10, applied the next season due to the timing of admin. Am I right in thinking that technically we never came out of admin as the football club was never in it in the first place?. SLH (which WAS in admin) was wound up after debts were paid, SFC simply carried on with new owners.

How's this for an absolute nightmare scenario Rangers go Pop Celtic realise there's no money to be made in continuing without them in SPL. Celtic owners buy Pompey, avoiding WUP and admin Close season change kit to green and white hoops All Celtic first teamers transfer to Pompey in exchange deal for all Pompey first teamers going other way. Portsmouth start next season as a reasonable team in Championship backed by Celtic money and all Celtic fans worldwide who realise they are now Celtic in all but name Cletic still win SPL using their reserves (previously known as Pompey) Arrrrrrghhhh I want to wake up

Young whippersnapper Really old people wear slip-ons

Think the award goes to the club that has to give out the most free tickets to "the community" . The fact that this is to try and fill seats and not an act of generosity does not get taken into account. Tokio Marine Family Club of the Year ??? Someone has to be taking the **** with that one.

To be fair they've only know for about 4 months. Look how long it's taken them to realise their club is in financial trouble.

Perfect example of you can prove anything with statistics. Based on a percentage of the few who bother to turn up at home their away support is very high indeed

Simple then. Save yourselves the money draining costs of running a stadium and play all your games away from home in future