trousers

..

As long as we don't give any credence to 'him' by highlighting it on here....oh.... ;-)

That takes me back. I remember those quaint nationalised british rail excuses with much fondness... ;-)

Blimey. The Tories will be catching up with labour at this rate! ;-)

So, what are the chances of Sky's management having set Gray and Keys up for a fall because they wanted to 'refresh' their presentation team but couldn't break them out of their contracts unless their was a disciplinery reason to do so? This is not my own personal suggestion of course, just a theory that is out there....

You have my word, I will buck up shortly.... So, in summary, we're saying that 'the economy' would have been less stagnant during 4Q10 if "a.n.other" government had been in power because in the relatively short space of time between then and the last election (in 2Q10) the UK as a whole would have been more "confident" in the economy that under the current government?

But I still don't have a tangible example to highlight the difference in consumer behaviour during 4Q10 depending on whether Labour or the ConDems (ho ho) were in power. I'm trying (fairly hard) to suggest that the average man (or woman) in the street would have pretty much spent the same under either regime, thus the economy would pretty much be in the same position at this relatively early stage in a five year government regardless. That said, I could be talking b*****ks (inconceivable I know)

p.s. Will ITV's Loose Women programme (for example) now be taken off the air for ridiculing men....? Or is that OK because it's "ironic"...? Yours, The Voice of Reason

RIP Free Speech 'Great' Britain, January 2010

So, for example, as a consumer of magazines, I was less likely to walk into WH Smiths on, say, 16th December and buy "Capitalist Monthly" under the current coalition Government than I would have been had Labour still been in power, thus denying a sale to WH Smiths, thus denting the British economy?

Fair enough, but give me a tangible 'high street' example though...... i.e. company 'x' would have sold more of product 'y' during November/December because of Labour cutting back at a rate 2% less that the ConDems (ho ho) have done.... A TANGIBLE example please....

May I asked what you typed into Google to find the video in the first place....?

BA?

^This

Or.... Cortese said to Fry: "Bazza me ole mucker. I'll give you £2m for Macko if we get an offer we can't refuse for Chambo. On one condition....if the press ever ask you if we've talked money, just say we had a chat about it, but never made a bid. Ok?" Fry to Cortese: "Okey dokey Nicky baby. Mum's the word, you cunning geezer you"

...

Christ, give me a chance....

Wembley have got the right idea.... I hear they're installing a banger racing circuit at Nottarf Krap....

Genuine question: Had Labour stayed in power last year, how would their policy on debt reduction have prevented this temporary seasonal dip?

Here's my bank details: 33-16-27 00893173 A deposit of £10k to underwrite your guarantee will suffice. Thanks. :-)

Just buy him FFS Mr Cortese. Even if we end up with too many strikers it's one less promotion rival to worry about. You'll get your money back next year.

The surrounding "track" is used by a travelling monkey chicken zoo during the week.

And if we don't pull it off....? ;-)

Couldn't agree more...