trousers

Sorry, forgot the at the end....subtle humour was never my strong point

Bugger...another one lost to international duty then...

Close, but no beaver

So is this one:

Nope...easy mistake.... "It's not who you know...."

Yes, just think of all the historic articles that have been swept under the carpet in one fowl swoop....not that there's anything we'd want to hide in our recent history of course....whoops, forgot, this is a football thread....as you were...

Link? ta

The words 'beggars' and 'choosers' springs to mind....

I do believe I have mentioned once or twice before that Jones and Tointon are the (only) Football Club board members, as of 2nd April 2009

cheers for that - apologies, wasn't sure who's in what loop. Thanks

What do you make of that? Seems clear enough to me.....

Is it too late to change my prediction from a 4-4-2 line-up.....?!!

About bloomin' time....!

whoops, yep, good spot

----------------- Poke ---------------------- Molyneux ---- Perry ---- Thomas ---- James Lallana ---- Pulis ---- Gillett ---- Holmes ------ Patterson -------- White -----------

Hi there. Just a quickie...can one read anything into the fact that you don't choose to defend Fialka in your post, just MLT and TL? cheers

07-10-2008 "What Lowe is doing should be commended, rather than ridiculed by the flatcaps. He is rebuilding this club, putting together an exciting new breed of talent and youngsters that will take us back to the Promised Land -- given time! The bootboy's brand of journeymen has beens and mercenaries would have sent this club to the edge and beyond."

He was Arthur English's body double in Are You Being Served.

I don't disagree that perhaps we did indeed have transparency on one side iof the fence...just not 100% sure...

Bottom line is, all this conjecture and misinterpretation of what conditions were on the table could have been avoided if Pinnacle and/or The Football League had been transparent about what the conditions under discussion were/are. There may well be confidentialities in the detail but I can't believe the higher level information would have been sensitive.