Matthew Le God

Broja signed a 5 year deal shortly before we signed him. So little incentive for Chelsea to sell him, like they did with Livramento who only had a year left and refused to extend his deal.

One game from halfway through the season and Ralph Hasenhüttl has a poorly funded Saints only 2 points away from 9th place Leicester City. Given the financial resources he has available without a takeover he is doing pretty well. 😇

Nope, it due to Covid...

Every single Premier League game is live on TV in non UK regions, this one is not on live in the UK. Streams are available for every single match from all the usual places.

I'd prefer him not to be needed to make any saves at all in a comfortable victory. A stellar performance from our keeper suggests something is going wrong in the game for us. 😉

It wasn't positive or negative, it was reality.

Not necessarily, the rest of the game would have been completely different. Still a huge amount of it left when the goal was ruled out.

Him rather than Romeu?

Did you think the same of 18 year old Livramento when he joined?

Some impressive CVs for their board members... https://redballac.com/

If he really has signed a new contract, what possible reason is there for the club to not announce it? Every other contract they announce at the time of it being signed, including in the youth teams.

No, because the numbers are reduced due to mask wearing, social distancing etc. We don't do those things for annual flu.

I don't have a chimney.

Why put trust in 'belief and hope' rather than things that manifest in reality?

You think I'm wrong about the purpose of my own post. You are just being absurd now! 🙄

You are very confused as to what cherry picking means. My post's sole purpose was to highlight you only read the headline and and not the content. I made no claim the bit I highlighted was the only information to take from the article.

So you are cherry picking from the Telegraph article. Cherry picking appears to be a hobby of yours. 🍒

I read the whole article, it appears you didn't. What are your thoughts on the section of the article I highlighted? That bit doesn't match your viewpoint does it?

Did you read this part of the article or only the headline...? "While omicron seems milder overall, the UKHSA has found it is not necessarily mild enough to avoid large numbers of hospitalisations. The experts have found evidence that for those who do become severely ill, there is still a high chance of hospitalisation and death. Given that the transmissibility of omicron is very high, there is the chance that even though it is milder, infections could soar to the point that large numbers end up in hospital."

That would require a lot of work to determine if each job is suitable to be done remotely.

Bun

He has been charged before, so why not again? 2019 - https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/jurgen-klopp-charged-liverpool-news-fa-referee-fine-west-ham-draw-reaction-a8778086.html

You are wrong. The 6 is recurring, so it is requires the vinculum symbol and not rounding to 67%. 😉😇

I don't disagree. But how is that relevant to anything I said in my post? 🤔