It's the manager's job to tell the players how to play, not the other way around. The next thing you know, he'd be telling Alan who to pick and it might be for all sorts of reasons, none of them to do with football.
Maybe he is trying to prove a point to the owners that the present squad is not good enough? He gives them a few games to show what they're worth and then replaces them wholesale.
Or am I clutching at straw thingies?
We need a proper midfield. Anyone who thought that last season's engine room could have been tuned up and provide a service in League one was very deluded. All four need replacing urgently. Oh well, one down, 3 to go and 12 days to get them.
It's taken years to get into this mess. It's not going to be turned round in a couple of weeks, and certainly not with some of the players that have been party to the mess.
When does the transfer window close?
It seems like a reasonable strategy to me. Buy up the best players in the division in every position. Then we'll have the best team and all the others will have lost a vital player.
If we have learnt anything from the last few years it's that changing your manager all every few months will get you nowhere. If we are still in this division at the end of the season then that is all that can be expected. It takes time to build a team with a winning mentality.
It's not his fault he's not very good. It's not a criticism, rather an observation. I would direct any questions to the one who selects him. I'd like to think that there are valid reasons.
This type of action from Lowe is only harming what litle reputation he has left and will not change anybody's opinion of his ability to 'manage' a football club. He must have a very *****ly ego to think that it is technically 9 or 10 managers that he has 'sacked'. His results speak for themselves.
Methinks the laddy doth protest too much.
(all in my humble opinion, of course)
The carpet fitter who was working on Luggy's new house at the time told me that he said "I think they're trying to get rid of me". Make of it what you will. As for Lowe, maybe 'sacked' is not the exact legal term. Shall we agree on: 'got rid of'?