Whitey Grandad

Midtjylland? Or was that some other sulker?

OK, I understand. Might be worth going through a VPN?

There might even be paper towels left at half time

Can’t you listen online?

It’s depressing that we don’t have better than either of those!

No worries, it’s all in jest. In my day they were called beatniks. Now they end up as leader of the Labour Party, or something.

Done

I don't think it's quite that straightforward. If a keeper comes for a cross and misses it then tough luck. If he collides with his own player then likewise. If he's about to claim the ball and an opponent clatters into him just as he's about to catch it then that's an obvious foul. What we had with Austin was somewhere in the middle. Without getting all lawyered up about it, this is what the relevant Law says about goalkeepers and their 'control of the ball'. A goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball when (my italics): The ball is between the hands or between the hand and any surface (e.g. ground, own body) or by touching it with any part of the hands or arms except if the ball rebounds accidentally from the goalkeeper or the goalkeeper has made a save Holding the ball in the outstretched open hand Bouncing it on the ground or throwing it in the air A goalkeeper cannot be challenged by an opponent when in control of the ball with the hands. http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct (These are not the FIFA Laws of Association Football)

Thanks, very interesting and sums up what we all thought. What I find surprising is how thinly the spread of possibilities for Swansea are and Huddersfield still have their work cut out. I bet this will all look a lot more different after this weekend.

I didn't think the atmosphere was too bad all things considered. The first half was dull, and we were sitting right up at the back of the lower level so not much noise from behind. Maybe those who were disappointed were spread out amongst other less vocal supporters. If you normally go and sing in a 'choir' then the noise is not going to be as loud as normal but the total sound made won't be much different and down on the pitch they won't even have noticed. Some of the players didn't even wake up until the second half anyway.

Bournemouth this season cheapest adult ticket £550 frozen for the third year running. Lowest home matchday ticket £32 Brighton cheapest £515 (350 concessions). Halfway line £730 (£500 concessions) Brighton renewals started from the 5th February. https://www.brightonandhovealbion.com/news/2018/february/season-ticket-renewals-for-201819/

You don't actually understand all this do you? Nobody has suddenly started calling them Boscombe, people have been calling them that for over 100 years. It's not some new fashion. Those who really know and love their football and its history will understand the background of the club and appreciate its rise to the top division. If you've never heard of it before then you've been walking around with your eyes and ears shut.

Please see above

Please don’t get me wrong, I’m just trying to explain but not excuse his decision which was very ‘soft’. It’s strange that seemingly the whole football world thinks it should have stood yet the professional referees think it was a foul. It’s as though they’re operating to a different set of laws. By the way, I used the word ‘persuade’ to indicate that I thought that Austin’s challenge was powderpuff.

Istanbul??? When did that happen? I’ve only just got used to calling it Byzantium.

If he could actually head a ball too he’d be terrific.

This time last year he was celebrating playing in the Champions League semi-final against Barcelona and going through 3-0 on aggregate. He came on in the final but couldn’t stop them losing 4-1 to Real Madrid.

There’s some of that in it. Brian Clough insisted that everybody at his club be as nice to the referee as possible because you never knew when you might need a favourable decision.

And terrible at man-marking. Admittedly he was pushed in the back yesterday but he should have been behind Morata instead of yards in front of him.

You're right, it has changed. If a goalkeeper only had one hand preesed on the ball you could kick it away from underneath. I watched the replays of yesterday a few times and Caballero doesn't have any hand on the ball when Austin first makes contact with him. However, Austin is backing slowly into him and this persuades him to mishandle the ball when it does arrive. Once Caballero has touched the ball then any further contact might be deemed a foul by an overly sensitive referee. Let's be honest, Caballero would almost certainly have caught the ball cleanly without Austin's presence. If Austin doesn't move then it can't be a foul but Austin looks at the keeper before making his move. If Charlie had concentrated on looking at the ball instead of turning his back then we might have had a different result.

My dad played in the Isthmian League around wartime as a full back and his job was to protect the goalkeeper from being charged by acting as a screening bodyguard. Times have changed. There was originally a purpose to the goal area but now it only acts as a place to kick the ball from. Tony Cascarino's take on this from The Times: There is too much protection for goalkeepers 'Charlie Austin’s disallowed goal for Southampton against Chelsea just shows how goalkeepers have got far too much protection. For a foul to be given against Austin, because he nudged into Willy Caballero as the goalkeeper jumped to claim a high ball, is ridiculous. It was a perfectly legitimate goal. Austin was not looking to foul Caballero and it feels like we have gone so far the other way, from goalkeepers having too little protection to now having too much. If you are going to stop play and award a free kick when they get touched in mid-air then you may as well stop crossing and heading. If I were a goalkeeper I would just run and jump into people on purpose knowing that I would get free kicks.'

A referee has a duty to play advantage but this can often lead to a worse infringement. Would Stephens have been sent off if the ref had stopped Wilshere's shirt-holding earlier and then booked him for it? Often a player retaliates when he is being persistently fouled. Players expect to get protection from the referee too and often a free kick and a warning can pre-empt trouble later.

You think that's bad? I saw a young kid with a full green keeper's outfit and 'Forster' on the back.

You'll have to be more specific that that. They could be anybody

Ball over the line is not for VAR and has its own technology, which did indeed indicate 'GOAL' on Atkinson's wrist. The question is whether Atkinson would have blown for a foul if it hadn't been a goal. Austin does back into Caballero but not excessively. The key here is whether Austin was gebnuinely trying to head the ball or was he more intent on disturbing Caballero?