I just have - after much juggling to get past all the padding - and it's not even clear if there is any contact, but it is totally irrelevant whether or not there has been any contact despite what all the commendators and pundits might tell you. It's not a foul to touch another player and it may be a foul even if you don't. It's not enough for a forward to run at another player and then touch them with his toe and go flying in a spectacular attempt to convince the referee that there has been a foul. Many referees will expect the attacker to make some genuine attempt to avoid the other player. Was Forster's touch (if any) enough to send a 6 foot athlete into a somersault? Had Fletcher hurdled Forster would he have reached the ball? Was he tripped or did he trip over? These are all the questions that have to be considered before reaching a decision. Forster's position was not unnatural for a goalkeeper trying to block a forward's shot. Some might have given it, others wouldn't. On this occasion we had the benefit of the doubt. All that you can ask of a referee is that he has consistent levels throughout the game of what constitutes a foul.