Micky

Dan Seaborne incident - closed. ____________ Move on.

Not stricly true, they need time & they need money - Sven took lots of money, therefore he never got the time.

Talented or not - he is a complete knob.

Is this thread for real, do we really have such helmet fans?

Not sure Jim - but having a google around and as far as I can see it means the jury are still out. I also had a look at POL as well and the poster (Moderator) that Corp Ho refers to has since retracted / deleted whatever statement he made and has also closed the thread - make of that what you will. Personally I really couldn't care either way, they will lose six points automatically - when they play us.

No I wouldn't like to join you - it's a civil war, not some political cock measuring contest.

Being a bit of a chicken I wouldn't like to say. But when we were perrennial 'drop dodgers' during many of our Premiership years, I always used to point to the last ten games as opposed to the first ten - still 30 points to go for. I think this year will be the same - good first 10, but let's wait and see where we are with ten to go - if we are still in the mix then, perhaps I'll start to really believe.

You shouldn't - the two disasters are not interlinked in the factors that directly caused them. In the case of Hillsborough the disaster was caused by human failure(s), as Kraken above stated - see the Taylor report. Heysel was caused by the stadium itself failing - two completely different things. I think you'll find that if you read the report into the Heysel Stadium - there were actually concerns raised about holding a major sporting event at the venue due to its delapidated state. Although football related tragedies - their main causes are fundementally different.

Errrr. it is already like that. There are only 4 teams that have won the Premiership, 4! And ManU have won it most years since it's inception. How much more boring could it get. This year, ManC might challenge them - could then be 5 clubs that have won it. ManC have spent somewhere in the region of 1 billion pounds in the last 2-3 years in order to achieve this. I can see Wigan, Blackburn, Everton and Bolton all challenging as well in the next few coming seasons - really, I can.

Errr, you started it...! Hopefully though your source was more creditable than this: http://fansonline.net/portsmouth/mb/view.php?id=379354

Dunno what all the fuss is about, Sky thought we were that good they told everybody that we'd won it: http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,11095_7244107,00.html Cool.

Give a s hit meter - not a flicker.

Would have taken that without kicking a ball - happy

Boro finito 1 - 1

I hate to not do an alps, but we could also win this now

BBC have us at 60% possession on this one ....

Would be better if sometimes you believed.

You can't of, I won it just a minute ago. I was the 1,000,000,000 visitor to the site - no shyte....!!!!

Ate, you is fick.

Thanks - nice to have some company, but so thick was I, that when I took the test again (same questions), I still managed to get 3 wrong...!!!

You're probably correct in that he is too good for league one, he's also relatively safe and reliable in this league - but international football - I think not. I'm actually a great fan of Kelvins - many would have gone and sat on West Hams bench (arguably for a lot more money than we were paying), but he chose to stay, gamble and play. I hope he is royally rewarded for that commitment with games in the Premier League, but even then I think that if we got there - we might assess certain positions - one of which would be his. Love his loyalty and passion for the game and the club - but that 'aint gonna get him into the international setup.

You don't post on here very often do you? About as frequently as you get out per chance?

Great thread - I just wish you had waited until we had played the skates - then we could all have included both Notarf Kraps, now that they have had new toilets and a clock installed...!!!

What is twoie...?