Deano6

Whereas you've always been more comfortable embracing mediocrity and failure in your life, right Timmy.

I don't know, I get why people are liking him but for me he's now 31 and we should be looking to the future for younger players who will be able to do the business for us in the Prem for many years to come. I'm also not convinced he'd fit in with our style of play. If it were 5 years ago when he was ripping it up in Madrid I'd say yes definitely, bite your hand off, but not now.

Wow - enjoy bullying much? At least Turkish's post was about the game.

It's a skewed way of looking at it, since Chaplow has missed more games than, say, Lambert so we should drop more points in that time. Someone should figure out how many points we have "dropped" when Tadanari has not been in the side. Or Bart for that matter!

Bloody hell, I remember the Togo bus was hit by gunfire but a bloody missile! That is crazy - did anyone survive?

He's probably not going to be tweeting though, to be fair.

Quite ridiculous way to judge a player. He was good today and gave us a better option when he came on.

I thought Sharp was excellent today and it was his runs on the break that directly led to both penalties.

Yeah, but as seems to happen with all our promising youngsters I'll bet good money either Spurs or Arsenal snatch him off us before he really makes it big.

Happy SBJ Day to all the playas in da house! Chronicle your evening's adventures here...

Jhon Viafara

This.

I just signed up to Google Sites, because it's free and I've heard of them. Did I make a mistake?

I do love that while their reaction is to be distraut they are losing one of their best players and wondering how they will cope without him, our reaction is "Meh, he wouldn't get in the team".

Crikey, you're right. Some of them are tremendous!

I must say that in my capacity as snooker referee and therefore occupational practitioner of keeping score with numbers, you have got your scaling all wrong here... 1) MRDROOPY You say this is %age of time when your member is 'at ease', and 0% is desirable. Well if you score 0% then according to your formula, you are either scoring 0 overall (since this 0 x rest of formula = 0) or negative if you were reliant on VIAGRA for a portion. You should of course have 1 - MRDROOPY where 100% is desirable. Then the first term in parentheses reads (1 - MRDROOPY - VIAGRA), which says reduce the score by % of time EITHER flaccid OR hard only through the blue pill. 2) ITSRAPE I can't help thinking you're incentivising the wrong thing here. I have 4 issues, for which I will descend into Roman Numerals to prevent confusion with my current numbering system: i. ITSRAPE is number of milligrams of rohypnol required to get participants in the mood. This figure is multiplied by 2.37 (an otherwise reasonable factor) and added to 1 to get the multiplicative factor contributing to the score. This implies that the more rohypnol the person requires, the higher the sexual prowess. However if you manage to get your victim to comply with your dirty requests with no medicinal assistance then you are not given any reward in the score, yet if you have no game and rely on them being out for the count before sticking your willy in untoward places you receive a high score. Again it is arse about tit. ii. It is not well laid out how such a figure should be calculated across the participants. Should it be the minimum required to bring a participant into the set, the maximum administered or an average. Should you be considered in any count or average? We cannot afford to be lax here. iii. The score requires that an ITSRAPE figure be calculated, ie that it be determined how much rohypnol would need to be administered to get a participant in the mood. Therefore once a determination has been made that a score will need to be calculated, it is then required that the unwholesome practise continue until its natural end. Thus if one of the participants decides she doesn't want to be part of it, in order for the formula to stand, she must continue taking the sweet elixir until she is unable to turn down the advances so that we know what her limit is. Isn't that a bit, I dunno, rapey? Just sayin'. iv. Really, when you boil it down, this scoring encourages you to ensure your conquest can handle a lot of rohypnol. For this you are looking to the fatties and the perennially abused. Neither of which you should receive a high score for, as they will be more easily coerced into the act anyway, for very different reasons. 3) POPPERS Yet again I believe you have got the scaling horribly wrong. You are dividing the score by 1 + number of nitrates inhaled. Now surely if such solvents are required then this is because either the orifices are too tight and need loosening, or because the wielding stick is too girthy. Both of these are marks of good sexual prowess and should be rewarded in the score, not penalised. Plus I'm gay and love taking them. 4) KY I could argue here from the same premise as POPPERS, but I'll let this one stand as it is the job of the male of the pack to get the vag and back passage nice and juicy. I would recommend introducing a dampening factor here though as we don't want to put off eager young bucks from adequately lubing up before entering, and also because it's a good pun. 5) ORGASMOROSCAR Here again we have a factor that is well considered but let down in the implementation. Whilst even the most die-hard amongst us would surely agree that participants should truly come like Old Faithful, you have your percentage downside up. You define the term as "The ratio of communicated enjoyment to the actual physiological climax". Thus lots of noise but no climax gives a very high, possibly infinite (if zero climax) score. If the reciprocal was introduced then indeed zero climax divided by plenty of canned adulation renders the score zero. The only problem is that the formula becomes corrupt if there is neither climax nor sound, but then that's probably a fair reflection of the evening's proceedings. The only other comment is that if there is high climax coupled with high noise, this gets normalised back to one, not recognising that it is in fact the sexual prowess holy grail. Therefore the term would be better served as "ratio of actual physiological climax to the square root of communicated enjoyment". Think about it. Therefore I propose the Deano6 modified-Bletch calculation as: ( (1 - MRDROOPY - VIAGRA) x (1 - (2.37 x ITSRAPE) ) * ( 1 + POPPERS ) / ( 1 + DAMP * KY ) ) * ( SQRT(COME) / ORGASMOROSCAR ) where COME = Communicated Enjoyment and DAMP = Dampening factor (to be determined)

Yeah, such bloody mongos singing songs in support of our players. I bet it was them Northam fcks who started it.

Good point. It was embarrassing how many goals Dexter let in.

He's Jos - too good to be true, He'll take the ball off of you, He's got a square head and he's Dutch, And he scores so much. Our new centre back has arrived And I thank Le God I'm alive. He's Jos - too good to be true. Can't take my eyes off you. Do-do Do-do Do-do-do-do-do Do-do Do-do Do-do-do-do-do Do-do Do-do Do-do-do-do-do Do-do Do-do Do-doooooooooooooooooooo We love you, Hooiveld, And if it's quite alright, We need you, Hooiveld, Without you we are sh!te. We love you, Hooiveld. Trust in me when I say: Oh, Jossy Hooiveld, Don't let us down, I pray. Oh, Jossy Hooiveld, now that we found you, stay And let us love you, Hooiveld. We f*cking love you. or something

I've been thinking for a while of creating a "personal wiki" (my description, not sure what else to call it) to organise a lot of info that I know but quickly forget, on a range of topics. I want it to be a bit like wikipedia in that each topic includes a bit of description in a way useful to me and hyperlinks to other pages on other related topics (internal and external to other sites). I want it to be on the web so I don't have to save it on any one computer and can access it anywhere. I'm not doing it for the benefit of anyone else on the internet, just for me to reference. That said I'm not sure it needs to be private - won't be anything confidential. What are my best options for this? There must be places on the web that offer something like this, but I'm not up on this stuff enough to know where to look. I guess it's a little similar to setting up a blog, but there are differences.

It's exactly anthropomorphisations like this that got them into the situation in the first place. You should hang your head in shame - you're as bad as they are! That dog does look sexy tho.

Do they? I was sat right next to the Dutch fans at Wembley last night (literally 4 seats away), and what they were chanting was apparently "oranje" (Dutch for...ok you got it), although it does sound quite a bit like a muffled "Holland" when you hear it.

And Turkish with mong.

Max Gradel, who had been moaning all game, fell over in the box or something, then stepped up to take it. Was slightly annoying, both to lose the clean sheet and slightly take the edge off a brilliant performance, but also meant we went second instead of top (or at least level with Ipswich, below on alphabetical order).