Turkish

Not football but there was a female swimmer called Misty Hyman.

Paul dickov

David Goodwillie

Stefan K untz.

Julian Dicks

Peter shirtliff (ter)

Which is perfectly reasonable. Man United can have 3,000 of their fans at st Mary's and we can have 3,000 of ours at old Trafford. The ruling actually protects smaller clubs with smaller grounds as having 10% in place means the likes of burnley and QPR can offer away teams fewer than 3,000 but still have 3,000 away tickets themselves. But of course Wes won't understand this with his persecution complex. We should be allowed to have 8,000 for Man United and so should everyone else, regardless of if the clubs needs them or not.

Correct me if i'm wrong here but Wes seems to be the only one that thinks he isn't talking utter bol locks, right?

It isn't really odd for this forum though is it. The majority on here cking have a clue what they're on about.

You can see why I've got him on ignore can't you fry. If I have someone on ignore then quoting them should be able to be seen anyway so don't quote that idiot. But to answer him Why should southampton be given 8000 away tickets when Man United only get ground when we will only give them 3000 of ours? They'll only fill it with plastics who just want to see old Trafford. That unfair, it's not Man Uniteds away supports fault they've for a bigger ground than southampton. It's disgusting. Why do southampton get that unfair advantage? Something needs to be done by the football authorities it's a disgrace.

There is a level playing field, every team can have 3,000 away tickets or 10% of the capacity if the ground is smaller at every ground for every premier league ground if they can sell them. Just because you don't like and have *****ed and moaned that it's so unfair it doesn't make it unfair.

They've owned him since 2008 anyway.

Eh? We've already established Dzeko isn't good enough for us, keep up pal.

If we sign him we can be sure he is as we only sign hungry players. Let's hope the staplewood training ground is well stocked.

Like someone on twitter going by the name Agent Edward would have a world exclusive.

Smells like Benfica to me, i remember when the Portoweb forum was in meltdown that lazy lying scumbag journos were trying to destablise them running story a couple of years ago that Joao Moutinho and James Rodriguez were joining Monaco for £60m. No way would they go to a small club in the French league this has to be the work of other clubs was the univeral view back then.

That's good enough for me. If we don't get him it'll be a disaster.

Another Porto player? Guess we may have had a scout at a game at the lying scumbag journos are now making mischief linking up with everyone in the team.

You do know football manager is a game dont you?

He really does hate us doesn't he. So bitter.

No you didn't. Why do people feel the need to exaggerate how they feel about it.

Heard similar. Another crack in Corteses little empire, no wonder he quit. Did he do his 'my word is my signature' line again?

For our anthem at kick off Something we all know, would be catchy and is sung very fast so the Northam would love it is supercalfrajalisticexpealidcious, we could even get a few anti pompey lines in too... Um diddle um diddle Um diddle ay (clap clap clap) Um diddle um diddle Um diddle ay (clap clap clap) super saints are fantastic, Pompey are atrocious Think they're the bestest in the world they all sound precocious We're the best because they are atrocious Super saints are fantastic Pompey are atrocious Um diddle diddle um diddle ay (clap clap clap) Um diddle diddle um diddle ay (clap clap clap) Clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap

To be fair he does have an impressive tan.

I'm amazed no one has picked up on the sloppy journalism in this article. Firstly how do they know they are football fans?they might have flag with the club crest on but what's to say they might have simply picked it up somewhere or it belong to someone not in the picture. As has been pointed out they aren't wearing football shirts or scarves or waving pictures of Matt Le Tissier in the air. Secondly, the describe the group as "yobs" the definition of yob is a young man who behaves in a rude, aggressive or violent way. Their faces are covered, how do they know they are men and they are posing for a photo, not behaving on any way like a"yob" would. Thirdly thier rape councillor again assumes its men she also assumes they are older men who have wives and friends.how can she tell? Their faces are covered, how can she tell they are men, how does she know they have girlfriend? how does she know they aren't all gay? All in all its a poorly researched piece riddled with assumptions and cliches written by anti saints agenda lazy lying scumbag journos. There clearly is no end to the lengths they'll go to to try and destabilise us.