-
Posts
44,690 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by hypochondriac
-
Limped off after Pompey.
-
People were calling for a change of formation for ages. We persisted with three at the back and it was at least partly responsible for throwing away so many game this season and leaving us miles away from the playoffs. Of course those saying we couldn't play it were going to get some stick when we changed formation and inevitably looked better.
-
Coming off an injury it makes sense.
-
Sure pal. I'll be sure to bring it up the next time we play better than we did with three at the back without Bree. The idea that Bree is the sole reason that we can play four at the back is a nonsense. Even if that were true, the club is entirely at fault for binning him off in the summer.
-
Lol. No evidence at all that we couldn't have played a different formation without Bree.
-
@egg @Fabrice29
-
What was the name of the PR agency who Lowe hired to post on here?
-
It's just bloody weird. He's clearly good enough to at least be backup to Scienza and take the pressure off him to play every game. There must have been a big row or something.
-
Not quite record given Luton but I take your point.
-
Agreed. You'd be better off picking us up for a song in a couple of years.
-
Hence the hope.
-
-
TBF pretty much the only thing Sports Republic have been good at is extracting decent value from the player sales.
-
Is selling Edwards any worse than selling Ballard?
-
Meh. Almost everything the club does it a pretty baffling way to run things. Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if THB goes but at least if Armstrong and THB go that's some of the pus lanced from the boil. Just Stephens, Aribo, Edozie, Downes and Wood to go.
-
Agreed. Can't believe the tax payer will have to pay for him. Hopefully gets a shiv in the showers.
-
Absolutely no idea. Still said he was injured but then reports came out that he's been fit all year. Even if we didn't want him long term you'd think we'd have been playing him to keep his value up.
-
Good news. I want the cancer removed -both players and the management. Some short term pain for long term gain
-
Incorrect. Supporting BDS is the extremist bit.
-
Of course you like her, she's one of the most extremist politicians in Parliament regarding Israel. I find her extremely odd in interviews, She's animated and emotional which comes across as strange and her style of delivery can be excitable and unusual. She seriously supported universal basic income which is enough of a reason to regard her as unserious, she threw a tantrum when Badenoch was appointed equalities minister which was just bizarre and over the top and I seem to recall an incident about assaulting her partner at a party conference but I think that was a long time ago. She also has sex with pans.
-
If that did happen I can't deny that it would be very amusing in a fatalistic kind of way. Stay up last day of the season with a 1-0 win off Archer's arse, sack Tonda and go for a 31 year old for the renewed push next year.
-
-
The lib dem leader and party aren't serious politicians. Nick Clegg was what made them vaguely electable last time.
-
Unfortunately with Labour and especially Starmer there are just some things I am ideologically opposed to that mean I could never vote for them in a general election. Trying to ram through the terribly flawed assisted suicide Bill, the tendency for big government, politics of envy penalising richer people often for very little benefit, this Chagos deal makes no sense to me even though I knew nothing about it prior to it being reported, scrapping jury trials is horrifying both left and right, I hate the concept of digital ID that Blair keeps trying to push through because of it being ripe for abuse and farmers inheritance tax was idiotic. Added to that all the minor stuff when they came in promising that the adults were back and that grubby politicians doing dodgy deals for stuff was over. I'm not sure how I could ever vote for that stuff-particularly under Starmer.
-
Cheers for the honest answer. I agree there isn't really any party that doesn't come with significant downsides. Lib Dem are a joke party and I would never vote for them again, having previously done so at a general election.
