Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    41,715
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. Then why bring it up encouraging people to comment? Clearly you are hoping for negative comments to support your weird agenda.
  2. Looks like you are looking for a negative reaction so you can go off on one again. You must be disappointed that no one has obliged you. You would have thought all those obvious racists would be desperate to write of their disgust.
  3. Art is actually head mental and a little obsessed with gay sex. Let's remember that this is the man that posted a link to hardcore gay pornography on the forum.
  4. Seriously? Why do people bother.
  5. Bit of an odd season really. We could finish on the same or even surpass the amount of points we got last year but somehow we seem weaker. Maybe it's because we haven't blown away teams like we did on occasion last year. I'd really like one or two exciting attacking players signed this summer to go with our solid base, especially if we lose Mane. We also need some other players to pick up the slack if the likes of Tadic go off the boil again and a Wanyama replacement.
  6. Interesting that those on here desperate to find Islamaphobia around every corner are the same people desperate to claim this isn't anti-semitism. Not surprising at all.
  7. Agree with all that. That's a evenly balanced response.
  8. You're right. Probably best I leave it there. I genuinely think there may be something the matter with him.
  9. So I guess your ignoring later in that same paragraph where I talk about analysing it from every conceivable angle and interviewing random passers by then? So erm I had a problem with the frequency and the type of coverage. Exactly as I said in the paragraph you just posted. Not sure why it being saints fans would make much difference, if the media acted in a similar way then no doubt I'd feel the same.
  10. [emoji38]OK "mate" whatever you say.
  11. You're now either wilfully misunderstanding me or you're just thick. My post was clear and at no point did I say the media should not report on it. I don't care if you think you know what I meant, you're wrong. As usual.
  12. You're talking absolute nonsense once again. All that sentence does is underline what I have been saying- I'm complaining about the frequency and type of the coverage rather than the fact it has been reported on. Just because you can't understand it you describe it as backtracking? Odd.
  13. If you could comprehend anything you would realise that I was complaining about the amount of coverage and the type (interviewing random passers by and celebs etc) rather than the fact that they reported on it at all.
  14. Once again putting words in my mouth. Where did I say the media should not report on it?
  15. Again, it's not the families that are subject to criticism, it's the media and how they choose to report on things.
  16. Good post and sums up my views. I hope all involved can now move on but if anyone has obviously broken the law then they should also be dealt with.
  17. He's still going! And you reckon I have an obsession? I stand by my comments, the reporting as with all major disasters in this country is over the top (look at the coverage given to celebrity deaths for example) and the media disects things from every angle which only serves to lessen the effect of said tragedy. Just because you disagree abd think that sort of thing is disgusting doesn't make it less of a valid opinion. Your obsession with me is a bit weird but I'd never be as disgusting as to suggest you have some sort of mental illness.
  18. You had insulted me previously and then asked me if I was autistic or had aspergers. Firstly even if I were I'm not sure why that would be of interest to you and secondly the clear implication was that there was something negative with having either of these conditions. It's all written down and you will now deny it but everyone else knows what you meant from these despicable comments. You then have the nerve to lecture others about the types of things that you yourself have been engaged in.
  19. If I were going to listen to anyone's mock outrage it would most certainly not be you considering previous comments you have made and the lack of judgement and intellect you have demonstrated time and time again. Your main problem once again is a lack of understanding. This time it is regarding criticism of the media and it's coverage which isn't the same as criticising the families of those involved in the tragedy. The only thing appaling around here is when you try to use autism to point score and then pretend you didn't.
  20. Those were the words of a relative of one of the deceased.
  21. Thanks but I don't need a lecture about being callous from someone who uses autism for point scoring and who thinks the McCanns murdered their child and covered it up.
  22. I'm not being "hard", I'm expressing an opinion that you don't like. By all means the families and the city of Liverpool are allowed to celebrate this and mourn the dead again but excuse me if I find the constant coverage tiresome. It's a tragedy just like many other tragic events that happened when I wasn't really old enough to appreciate it. I hope those directly affected have a degree of closure and I agree with whelk that it should absolutely not be ignored completely in the murdoch press but neither should it be analysed from every conceivable angle such as asking passers by on the street for their opinion. I'm fully prepared for the abuse or the incredulous posts because that's the easy response rather than engaging your brain and thinking about it. Thanks to those who can discuss it sensibly.
  23. Nothing wrong with them going over it and celebrating it again and I never said they couldn't, I just don't want it cutting away from the radio programme I'm listening to literally ever ten minutes to go and interview passers by on the street about it or random celebrities. I've expressed this sentiment before but it's like when a celebrity dies and you can't escape it. It's been on every online news outlet multiple times with analysis from every angle and poring over it in minute detail and the only thing it accomplishes is that it lessens the impact of it and get people annoyed to the point that they become particularly nasty men as you put it.
  24. Very much so when I'm trying to listen to something interesting on the radio and they keep cutting away every five minutes to report on it again. It's a tragic occurence but the court case isn't going to bring them back and going over and over the same things including asking passers by on the street achieves nothing. I don't blame the victims but I do blame the media. All it does is have the opposite effect of what is intended- to lessen the impact of these sort of things and report upon it with such frequency that many people stop caring. *stands back and waits for the next poster to run in screaming abuse.
  25. You're clearly some sort of Liverpool fan. I get you're passionate about this issue but you really need to calm down just because someone has the view that fans had a portion of the blame too. It's a tragedy whoever is to blame but I can't be the only one bored by the interminable coverage of it all.
×
×
  • Create New...