Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    44,798
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. It's not going to happen. Neither side want it and both realise it would be absolute political suicide.
  2. I'd like to see them try. Not a chance will they put a hard border on Ireland.
  3. We'd all like to bring in new players given the opportunity but it's jot going to happen
  4. You're mad. I hope he leaves as soon as possible.
  5. We had similar things like this in previous windows. It's clear we wanted one cb, we kept our options open and then got the one we want. My guess is we will sign an attacker and that will be it for this window after offloading boufal.
  6. Quite clearly a brilliant mind. Probably a nightmare to live or have any sort of relationship with- bit like Steve jobs in that respect.
  7. The difference is some players are icons separate from the clubs they play for. People buying a high profile players shirt aren't actually supporters of the club.
  8. Would most likely do better than Mope
  9. Pretty sure it's a subject that is almost unheard of on here- something that unites the forum.
  10. Good for them. I hope they make a success of it.
  11. Christ right bunch of moaners on here and people reckon I'm overly negative! If we pay a small sum like ten million for ings I'd give him a chance, I think there's a good chance he would be better than many think. I reckon we will do better than last year and we have a better quality in the squad already so that's good enough for me.
  12. Has zero relevance to this discussion
  13. No one has suggested paying 20 million or that we are likely to. Its Liverpool's initial valuation that its incredibly unlikely we share.
  14. Yep that's probably true. Most likely because I'm not a fan of hypocrisy and there's a heck of a lot of that when it comes to far left progressive types.
  15. You can level a lot of criticism at me but you definitely cannot pretend I haven't said a hugs amount about my political opinions- to the point that some would rather I stopped talking about them! Just because I've been consistently misrepresented with people labelling me far right with no evidence does not mean that I haven't made my opinions on a range of issues abundantly clear.
  16. I hope you're not suggesting that not entering into any discussion on a group is some sort of endorsement? Besides I don't remember any discussion on the topic but as I've said it's just as pointless. And no I don't think the Iraq war protests were pointless though its true to say that some people who took part in it were quite embarrassing.
  17. Hold on I didn't say anything about the football lads alliance. I think that's a pointless waste of time too.
  18. Yes tamesaint I already addressed that point in post number 304 and 314.
  19. I do believe so yes but from memory we had at least one game with half decent opposition.
  20. Loads of people on here thought that pre season results meant we would be the surprise team storming the league. Didn't quite work out like that did it...
  21. Yes that proves my point. It's all designed to make these people feel good about themselves and make them feel like they are achieving something when the reality is the opposite. At the moment it's possible that he could be looking at another term so all those protests about what a monster he is have seemingly had little effect. If the aim is to get him removed then they aren't doing a very good job at all.
  22. OK if it makes them feel better but the reality is that if he were impeached they had absolutely nothing to do with it. Everyone knows all the views against trump. Getting us talking isn't about any new conversations regarding him, it's just the same talking points recycled. The protests were primarily about making some middle class types and some people in strange costumes feel good about themselves and make them feel like they are contributing to something when in reality that isn't the case which is why I said the protests were largely self indulgent
  23. Again a total misinterpretation of what I said. It's a fact that many people on marches such as these have done very little beyond attending the march. I know this because I have spoken to people who have participated, because I have friends all over Facebook who have attended and because of interviews that are freely available. You know as well as I do that this is the case and if you want to now pretend otherwise then you're just being disingenuous. I never said that I expected everyone to have identical opinions, what I said was that I considered worthwhile protests to be when the majority who are there are able to articulate what the practical goals of a protest are. If most of the protesters of the women's march all have different motivations for being there or can't even articulate why they have attended, then what is the point other than to collectively scream at the sky? To use just a couple of examples, Vietnam War protests in previous decades had a practical goal which was to pressure the American government to end the conflict. Black civil rights protests wanted the same rights afforded to people of colour that other races had. The difference between protests like that and the Anti trump rally is that the overarching aims were clear and I don't think anyone can claim they weren't worthwhile and that they had tangible impacts. Voicing a United dislike of Trump achieves precisely nothing and will change nothing. They have the freedom of speech to dress in whatever outfits they like, wave as many flags as they feel like and inflate as many balloons around the country as they want and many others have the right to question them for doing so or wonder if there isn't a better use for all that time and effort. Let's be fair though, the Sadiq Khan balloon and cash for it is also a giant waste of time and money and they would also be much better served donating all of that money to a worthwhile cause where they could actually do something positive.
  24. Probably because our attacking area is where we are weakest and if we were to bring Ings it is will be because we most likely don't consider him a has been and we would think he is significantly better than our other options including Gallagher. He wouldn't be my first choice but I'd give him a go over sticking with what we currently have because we know what we have is not sufficient.
×
×
  • Create New...