Wade Garrett

Best of luck to you Duncan. I really think BA would be better served by getting rid of Willie Walsh, he has done f*ck all for their business.

Fair enough, my intolerant, know-it-all friend.

I suppose Sun readers who vote Tory are 'enlightened'. You seem unable to respect an alternative point of view, resorting to insults and petty name calling.

Is Club92 still going strong?

dune, just wait until the proper poll tomorrow. Have a few beers and chill out.

I've gone for Tories 36% 271 seats Labour 30% 272 seats Liberal 27.2% 79 seats Others 5.8% 28 seats I think the seats calculator is a little skewed, I think the Tories will win more seats than Labour.

There you go again Wes. Insulting people because they don't have the same view as you.

Rubbish. My school football team didn't even have a kit, we had to wear our own red tops, black shorts and red socks (all different styles). In fact, my school didn't really have anything - old books, sh*tty old classrooms, rubbish science labs, the list goes on and on. The private sector was thriving that much we had riots because of mass unemployment (and Tories saying it was a 'price worth paying').

Murdoch is siding heavily with Cameron because he wants a few favours.

What about all the nazi stuff, dune?

Wes you seem intelligent, so why try to paint anyone who votes labour as some sort of left-wing lunatic?

I wasn't talking about bosses, or their political persuasions. I was referring to the government legislation on working hours. I am happy as it stands, and would not want it changed. You seem to make a lot of assumptions.

That's fine as long as it's voluntary.

Specifically, I mean not being forced to do more than a 48 hour week. Voluntarily is fine, but I work hard and like time with my family as well.

That's fine. I'll wait and see. But to be honest I quite like the right not to work sweatshop hours. I am not saying that I will under the Tories, as I say, I'll wait and see.

Surely you don't mean the 'Abramovich of the Wessex League'? What a prize knob. I used to enjoy beating them on their crappy ground. Doesn't the mental bell ringer have his bookshop in Petersfield? Maybe he has a Marc Jackson sort of role in this. Hope so.

As long as this isn't achieved by exploiting the workforce I have no real problem with that.

Cheers Wes, your explanation (apart from the last paragraph) is quite heplful. Your last paragraph is a bit silly though, and implies I am some sort of communist, which is pretty far from the truth.

I'm Big Ears, Jim.

Don't worry dune, every worker will have the same rights as workhouse workers under a Tory government anyway.

I think it's ironic when Thatcherite Cameron talks about 'Big Society' when Maggie herself said in a famous interview 'there is no such thing as society'. Leopards don't change their spots. To think the Tories have gone caring and sharing is rubbish.

If we have to make cuts, that everyone pays for, then why are the rich getting some back in inheritance tax? Why should I pay and not them?

Sad.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/4092926/Second-bank-bailout-plans-condemned.html http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics-news/election/election-2010-news/2010/04/28/election-2010-we-got-it-wrong-on-bailing-out-the-banks-admits-top-tory-kenneth-clarke-86908-22217613/ Not him directly, but his Chancellor elect, and a former Chancellor.

Their inheritance tax plans for the multi-millionaires, while cutting spending elsewhere answers that one.