Lord Duckhunter

Exactly. Look at Harry Kane. I’m not saying he’ll be anywhere near that standard, but writing him off already is fuckwittery of the highest order. If he does well on loan, he deserves a shot back with us. It’s not like we’re pulling up trees without him.

I thought that was part of the fixed term Parliament act which has now been repealed.

Complete and utter pony. They’d have voted Kemi & Braverman over Truss, they’d have voted Priti over her as well. It was nothing to do with his colour and everything to do with the perception he stabbed Boris. I know he’s the new Rory, every non Tory voters favourite Tory, but his colour had fuck all to do with it.

Watching the deranged meltdown of Lefties and the wokeriti when Big Dog wanders back into number 10 would be delicious, but unfortunately it’s not the time for a high spending Tory. realism not cakeism is the order of the day as the country is in a financial straight jacket. Regardless of previous indiscretions he’s not the man for this crises. The best thing for the Tory party is for him to go through to the members and then get beat, anything else will continue to poison the well. Sunak is the one the markets will want, and that’s probably what they’ll get.

Unity? I thought you were serious for a minute, until I read your “picks”.

😴 💤 Somebody give the tight wad a fiver, so he doesn’t have to crowbar all his daily opinions into 3 posts…

The systematic sex abuse is predominately down to one particular group, not that you’d acknowledge that. The NHS isn’t fit for purpose, yet people like you will blame the Tories as opposed to the “heroes “ that work in it or the system itself. The police are full of people who agree with you on most social issues . And the rest of your post is covered under other anti Tory & Brexit threads. You aren’t “genuinely interested” in other views, you’re just trolling.

I thought it was a decent away performance against an in form team. Good tactical set up from Ralph & I liked the way we seemed to go a bit longer. The key to that was Che, who was outstanding, proper centre forward play. For once the substitutions were perfect and helped us see out the game (particularly SA). No complaints from me, proper performance.

Fair play to Ralph, he set us up well, made good tactical changes & the players clearly played for him. One result doesn’t change anything, he needs a run of decent performances, to convince me he deserves more time. Clearly we have a tough run of fixtures, and being realistic we're going to struggle to get a lot of points, but we can show attitude, application and tactical intelligence. We can’t be mincing around like we did at Anfield and other games last season. We need to be tough to beat, before I’ll change my mind about him.

And why they’ve won fuck all for years.

Typical selfish response. Even the Labour Party know it’s unsustainable in its present form, which is why they didn’t vote against the Tories changing it last year. Unlike you, they understand the long term implications of maintaining it in its present form. But thanks for highlighting the problem Government faces when trying to balance the books. Middle class outrage when their money is earmarked for redistribution.

Well of course it doesn’t, which group of people would like their income cut. However, it will become unaffordable over time. Personally it’s, better for me if it’s kept (and noticeable that 2 lefties who it also benefit “liked” you post), but long term it will have serious implications for the affordability of future pension provisions and particularly the income of our future poorer pensioners. You can bet your life it’ll be watered down and changed by the next Gov, whatever colour they are.

It’s one of those policies that neither party really want to keep as it’s going to become horrendously expensive in the coming years. Tories put it in the manifesto because of pressure and pensioners votes, but would amend it given half a chance. This was the chance (as they could hardly fall any lower in the polls ) but they don’t look like they’re taking it. The Labour Party would love it if the Tories broke the commitment prior to them taking office, as it’ll do a must needed but unpopular reform for them. Perhaps that’s played a part in the decision, because economically it makes sense to water it down but whoever does so will probably take a political hit.

In that case no manager would ever be sacked, as pretty much none of them control transfers. In terms of influence around the football side of the club & longevity, I’d imagine Ralph is right up there with any manager in the league. Strange how other managers get sacked, but we have people still trotting out excuses. If you want to manage “your team”, players hand picked by yourself, the premier league isn’t the place. The buck stops with him, just as any success is his.

Or if they’re facing Che Adams & Adam Armstrong

If they didn’t want to, it wouldn’t be a resignation 🤡. How can you resign without wanting to, by accident?

He was in nets at half time & he was shite, made Forster look light footed. Deserved to be booed & my mate heard the boos from Gran Caneria

Martin Lewis addressed this the other day. Standing charges are a fixed daily rate that you pay for having an electricity and/or gas connection to cover the cost of supplying energy. Under the energy price cap, Ofgem is using standing charges to recover the costs of the huge number of energy firms that went bust last year – a total of £1 billion this year. About £68 of the typical £1,971 a year bill under the current price cap is for supplier failures, while other costs, such as increases in fixed network costs (the cost of maintaining energy networks) and policy costs (such as green levies and the rise in the warm home discount rebate) also contributed to higher standing charges.

Good to see somebody getting stuck in and not letting the opposition settle. Technically, he’s not the best but he’s got a good attitude & a bit of fight about him. Certainly better than watching Djneppo mince about at full back.

Yes

You didn’t say she was from an immigrant family, you said she was an “immigrant”. Despite the fact she’s as British as you or I, you called her an “immigrant”. If I called Marcus Rashford or Diane Abbot an immigrant, I’d rightly be accused of being a racist. Nick Griffin & Tommy Robinson believe that shite, that people of colour are “immigrants “ regardless of where they’re born, but normal decent people don’t. Your use of “they” is also borderline. Most people would write “black people used to be called xxx”, not “they” used to be called.

Why not try both down the middle, Adams battles well, holds the ball up ok and wins some bits and pieces. Armstrong can buzz around him, picking up the pieces. I know it’s probably against the Hipsters playbook, but it can’t be any worse than the shambles we’re watching week in week out. 3-5-2 and get it in the mixer a bit more……

My mate was Richard Keys’ plumber and did a lot of work for him over the years. Said he’s a really decent bloke, I don’t know if he is, but my mates a good lad so I’ll take his word for it. It’s clearly just an unfunny Dad joke type routine. Man up women FFS, when birds get together they’re just as bad with the old innuendos & jokes about their other halves. Let Keys & Grey get on with their careers, it’s not like they spat at a viewer.

You need experienced pros who are good pros, around the club, especially when you’ve got a bunch of nippers. OR of last season is perfectly capable of coming in & playing the odd game here and there, coming on at the end of games to see them out, but more importantly setting a great example to the younger players day in day out. We’ve got a fucking choir boy as skipper, and we shipped out a player with the correct mentality and professionalism needed. We kept Walcott FFS, keeping a slightly over the hill OR was a no brainer in my opinion.

Sexist.